Section Articles

PENGARUH QUALITY OF WORK LIFE (QWL) TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI DI BANK DANAMON SYARIAH MAKASSAR

Syarif Al Qadri
[email protected] (Primary Contact)
Moh. Yasin Soumena
Muhammad Kamal Zubair

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study discusses the influence of Quality of Work Life conducted by Bank Danamon Syariah Makassar. Quality of Work Life is a management concern about how work can affect humans, organizational effectiveness and the importance of employee participation in decision making processes, especially those related to career, income and time. front of them in their work. The purpose of this research is to find out whether the effect of Quality of Work Life consisting of Rewards System, Work Environment, and Work Restructuring variables influences employee performance. And to find out the dominant variables simultaneously influencing.


This research is a quantitative research with descriptive method. The data collection is done through the distribution of questionnaires. The method used to test hypotheses is to use Validity Test, Reliability Test, Normality Test, Multiple Regression Analysis, T Test, F Test, Adjusted R Square, and Double R Correlation.


Linear regression test results, Y = 11,976 + 0.488 x 1 + 0.081 x 2 + 0.033 x 3, it can be concluded that the variable X1 is the Rewards System that has a value of 0.488 and has a positive and significant effect on employee performance variables (Y), variable X2, namely Environment Work with a value of 0.081 does not have a positive and significant effect on the Employee Performance variable (Y), variable X3, namely Work Restructuring, which has a value of 0.033, does not have a positive and significant effect on the employee performance variable (Y). The results of this study indicate: based on the t (partial) calculation of the reward system, the calculated value is 3.450 and the value (sig) = 0.002 is smaller than the probability value that is 0.05 or 0.002 <0.05, meaning that the dominant reward system variable has a positive and significant effect on employee performance at Bank Danamon Syariah Makassar. T-test results (partial) work environment obtained a calculated value of 0.650 and (sig) = 0.521 greater than the probability that is, 0.05 or 0.521> 0.05 means that the work environment variable does not affect the performance of employees at Bank Danamon Syariah Makassar. And the t-test results (partial) work restructuring obtained a calculated value of 0.239 and (sig) = 0.813 greater than the probability of 0.05 or 0.813> 0.05 which means the work restructuring variable has no effect on employee performance at Bank Danamon Syariah Makassar

Keywords

Sistem Imbalan Lingkungan Kerja Restrukturisasi Kerja Kinerja

Article Details

How to Cite
Al Qadri, S., Soumena, M. Y., & Zubair, M. K. (2020). PENGARUH QUALITY OF WORK LIFE (QWL) TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI DI BANK DANAMON SYARIAH MAKASSAR. BANCO: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Perbankan Syariah, 2(1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.35905/banco.v2i1.1347

References

  1. Al-Qur’an dan Terjamahan. Kementerian Agama RI.
  2. Abdullah, Thamrin dan Francis Tantri. 2014. Bank danLembaga Keuangan, edisi I. Cet. III; Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  3. Ali, Zainuddin, 2011. Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafik.
  4. Andika, Widya puspa. 2015. Analisis Pengaruh Non Performing Financing Pembiayaan Murabahah, Mudharabah dan Musyarakah Terhadap Profitabilitas pada Bank Umum Syariah. Skrpsi sarjana : Universitas Jember.
  5. Anshori, Abdul Ghofur. 2007. Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. Cetakan pertama.Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
  6. Ascarya. 2007. Akad dan Produk Bank Syariah. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
  7. Asiyah, Binti Nur. 2015. Manajemen Pembiayaan Bank Syariah. Yogyakarta:Kalimedia.
  8. Darmawan, Indra.1992.Pengantar Uang dan Perbankan, (Edisi I Pt. Rineka Cipta, Oktober.
  9. Dendawijaya, Lukman. 2005.Manajemen Perbankan, edisi II. Bogor: Gralia Indonesia.
  10. Djamil Faturrahman. 2012. Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah di Bank Syariah. Cetakan pertama. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
  11. Hasan, Zubairi. 2009.Undang-Undang Perbankan Syari’ah. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  12. Hasibuan, Melayu. 2006. Dasar-dasar Perbankan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
  13. Herman, Darmawi. 2016. Manajemen Risiko. Jakarta : PT. Bumi Aksara..’
  14. Irham, Fahmi. 2013. Pengantar Manajemen KeuanganTeori dan Soal Jawab.Cetakan kedua. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  15. Ismail. 2011. Perbankan syariah. Jakarta:kencana.
  16. Ismaya, Sujana .2006. Kamus Perbankan. Bandung: Pustaka Grafika.
  17. Karim, Adiwarman A. 2004. Bank Islam Analisis Fiqih dan Keuangan, Ed. 3. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
  18. Kasmir. 2002. Bank dan lembaga keuangan lainnya. Jakarta : PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
  19. Kasmir.2011. Analisis Laporan KeuanganCetakan ketiga. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  20. 2014. Manajemen Perbankan. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada.
  21. Kuncoro, Mudrajat,2002. Manajemen Perbankan:Teori dan Aplikasi, Yogyakarta: BPFE.
  22. Kusumawati, Hutami. 2010. Pengaruh Tingkat Risiko Mudharabah danMurabahah terhadap Tingkat Profitabilitas Bank Syariah.Skripsi. Bandung: Universitas Widyatama.
  23. Machmud, Amir. 2010.Bank Syariah (Teori, Kebijakan, dan Studi Empiris di Indonesia ). Jakarta: Erlangga.
  24. Mukhlis, Imam. 2012. Kinerja Keuangan Bank Syariah dan Stabilitas Makroekonomi Terhadap Profitabilitas Bank Syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan. Vol 16, No 2 Universitas Negeri Malang
  25. Nasution, 2003.Metodologi Research Penelitian Ilmiah, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  26. Reki, Fiswah. 2008. “Pengaruh Tingkat Non Performing Loan Pembiayaan Mudharabah dan Pembiayaan Musyarakah Terhadap Profitabilitas (Return On Asset) Pada Bank Syariah (Studi Kasus Pada PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri).” Skripsi.Fakultas Bisnis dan Manajemen Universitas widyatama.
  27. Republik Indonesia, Undang-undang RI Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan.
  28. Rifqi, Muhammad. 2010. Akuntansi Keuangan Syariah, Konsep dan Implementasi PSAK Syariah. Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: P3EI Press.
  29. Rimadhani, Mustika. 2012. Analisis Variabel-variabel yang Mempengaruhi Pembiayaan Murabahah.Pada Bank Syariah Mandiri Periode 2008.01-2011.12.Vol. 19. Jurnal, Alumni Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Trisakti.
  30. Rivai, Veithzal, dkk.2007. Bank and Financing Institution Manajement Conventional & Shariah System.Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  31. Rokmana, Siti Nila. 2012. Analisis Pengaruh Risiko Pembiayaan terhadap Profitabilitas (Studi Kasus Pada Bank Muamalat Cabang Semarang).Skripsi. Semarang: Institut Agama Islam Negeri Walisongo.
  32. Sagir, Soeharsono. 2009.Ekonomi Indonesia Kapita Selekta, Cet I. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  33. Soemita, Andri. 2009.Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Syariah (Cet. VII; Jakarta: Kencana.
  34. Sudarsono, Heri. 2008.Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Syari’ah Deskripsi dan Ilustrasi. Yogyakarta: EKONISIA.
  35. Suwiknyo, Dwi. 2010.Jasa-jasa perbankan syariah . Yogyakarta: Pusaka pelajar.
  36. Sumber Internet :
  37. SE BI No. 9/24/DPbs (diakses tanggal 5 juni 2018).
  38. www.bi.go.id (diakses 18 maret 2018).
  39. www.ojk.go.id (Diakses, 10 juni 2018).
  40. http://id.m.wikipedia.org (diakses 10 juni 2018).