Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper discusses the contribution of the conception of takwil (interpretation) of the Ushuliyyun (theologians) in the concept of inheritance of various religions. The theologians derived the takwil method in the Istibath Ahkam as one of the methodologies of Islamic law. Takwil is a transfer from the foreign meaning to the concealed meaning based on the relevant arguments. This study applies library research as an approach by conducting studies on numerous legal materials considering the concept of takwil in inheritance of various religions. This study contributes comprehensive interpretation view concerning the dubs and educates that must be recognized so that the takwil carried out turns into accepted interpretation. As for takwil which bears no evidence and particularly due to the lust, this interpretation view could not be applied. The purpose of this interpretation approach that dealing with troubles in community concerning Islamic rule could be observed on the takwil application for inheritance in the different religions that are described so as to present the contemporary idea that the inheritance prohibition for different religions is particularly for the harby infidels. A Muslim also can be the heir of the non-Muslim infidels.

Keywords

Takwil, Ushuliyyun, Inheritance

Article Details

References

  1. Daftar Pustaka
  2. Al-Qur’Ān Al-Karīm, n.d.
  3. Abd. Al Wahhab bin Ali, Al Subki. Al Jawami’ Fi Ushul Al Fiqh. Beirut: aL Kutub aL Ilmiah, 2003.
  4. Al-Khathib, Muhammad al-Syarbini. “Mughī Al-Muhtāj.” Kairo: Musthafa al-Baby al-Halaby, 1958.
  5. Al-Qurthuby, Ibnu Rusyd. Bidayatul Mujtahid Wa Nihayah Al-Muqtashid. Jakarta: Pustaka Aman, 1989.
  6. Ali, Abi Bakr Bin. Bayan Al-Mukhtashar Syarh Mukhtashar Al- Muntaha Al-Ibn Al-Hajib Fi Ushul Al- Fiqh. Jami’iyah Um al Quro’, n.d.
  7. As-Sarakhsi, Ahmad bin Abu Sahl. Ushul As-Sarakhsi. Bairut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiah, 1993.
  8. Effendi, Satria. Ushul Fiqih. Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.
  9. Hafzah, Abu. Ensiklopedi Fiqih Al. Ponorogo: Pustaka al-Bayyinah, 2014.
  10. Ismail Abu Abdullah al Bukhary, Muhammad bin. Sahih Bukhari. Beirut: Darul Ibnu Katsir, 1987.
  11. Jauziyah, Ibn Qayyim al. Ahkamu Ahl Zimmah. Beirut: Dar al Hadist, 1995.
  12. Mughniyah, Muhammad Jawwad. Al-Fiqh Alā Madzhab Al Khamsah. Kairo: Maktabah al Fikrah, 1993.
  13. Qardhawi, Yusuf. Fatwa-Fatwa Kontemporer, Jilid 3. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2002.
  14. Syarifudin, Amir. Ushul Fiqih Jilid 2. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Groub, 2008.
  15. Syaukani, Muhammad Ali Al. Irsyad Al Fuhul Ila Tahqiq Al Haq Min Ilm Al Ushul. Riyad: Dar al Fadilah, 2000.
  16. Wahbah az-Zuhaili. Ushul Al-Fiqh Al-Islami. Damsyiq: Dar al-Fikr, 1986.
  17. Zaidan, Abd al-Karim. Al-Wajiz Fi Ushul Al-Fiqh. Baghdad: Muassasah Qurtubah, 1976.
  18. Zarkasyi, Muhammad bin Abdullah Al. Al Burhan Fi Ulum Al Quran. Kairo: Dar al Hadist, 2006.
  19. Artikel Jurnal
  20. Baihaqi, Wahid Ahtar. “Revitalisasi Maqasid Al-Shariah : Pembacaan Ulang Konsep Kewarisan Beda Agama.” Muslim Heritage 1, no. 2 (2017): 107–24.
  21. Dedi, Syahrizal. “Konsep Ta’wil Ushuliyyin Dan Relevansinya Dengan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah 17, no. 01 (2018): 1–18.
  22. Dedi, Syarial. “Ushul Al-Fiqh Dan Kontribusinya (Konsep Ta’wil Dan Relevansinya Dengan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam).” Al Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam 2, no. 2 (2017): 103–6.
  23. Tohari, Chamim. “Rekonstruksi Hukum Kewarisan Beda Agama Ditinjau Dari Al-Ushul Al -Khamsah.” Mazahib : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam 16, no. 1 (2017): 1–4. https://doi.org/: http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/mj.v16i1.625.
  24. Zainuddin, moh ridwan. “Tafsir,Ta’wil Dan Terjemah.” Al-Allam 1, no. 1 (2020): 1–17.