Main Article Content

Abstract

The 21st century is the century of technological development in the information and communication sector. In March 2019, it was shown that out of 150 million active Indonesian users, 88% were confirmed to have accessed YouTube. Being the best-selling application motivates content creators to create exciting content that can continue to attract fans. Lately, netizens are very fond of entertainment-based content which is closely related to pranks. One of the best-selling prank videos that topped trending number 1 in January 2019 was a YouTuber video disguised as a vagrant and a crazy person with his wife. This article aims to provide an insight into how pranks (joking) are taught in Islam based on the perspective of the Al-Quran and Hadith so that the content or videos created do not harm YouTubers. This research is qualitative research with the character of library research. The research data is obtained from books, international and national journals, research reports, articles from news media, magazines related to prank. After the data is collected, read and understand related to the problem being researched. Then the data were analyzed using data analysis techniques Miles and Huberman, namely data reduction, data presentation, and concluding. The results showed that even though entertainment by joking and laughing is a form of interactive communication that indicates happiness is also human nature. However, the culture of joking that is trending like pranks is not justified. On the other hand, prank becomes an act of humour that does not meet the ethical requirements of joking on the Islamic viewpoint.

Keywords

Prank YouTube Internet Al-Quran dan Hadith

Article Details

How to Cite
Purwaningsih, R. F., & Witro, D. (2021). Prank in Al-Quran and Hadis Perspective. KURIOSITAS: Media Komunikasi Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 14(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.35905/kur.v14i2.2072

References

  1. At-Tuwajiiri, M. bin I. (2000). (Penerjemah) Farizal Tarmizi. Pilar-pilar Ajaran Islam. Jakarta: Batavia Studio.
  2. Az-Zuhaili, W. (2002). Al-Qur’an Menjawab Tantangan Zaman. Jakarta: Mustaqim.
  3. Balakrishnan, J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social media addiction: What is the role of content in YouTube? Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(3), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.058
  4. Chandra, E. (2018). Youtube, Citra Media Informasi Interaktif Atau Media Penyampaian Aspirasi Pribadi. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Seni, 1(2), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v1i2.1035
  5. Detik.com. (2017). Mengenang Fenomena Singkat “Om Telolet Om” yang Mendunia. Retrieved September 26, 2020, from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3507250/mengenang-fenomena-singkat-om-telolet-om-yang-mendunia
  6. Detik.com. (2019). Kasus-kasus Prank Pocong-Tuyul yang Bikin Polisi Turun Tangan. Retrieved September 26, 2020, from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4770867/kasus-kasus-prank-pocong-tuyul-yang-bikin-polisi-turun-tangan
  7. Dewi, I. A. P. T. C., & Usfunan, Y. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korban Prank di Indonesia. Kertha Wicara, 7(2), 1–6. Retrieved from https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/39167
  8. Effendy, O. U. (2006). Ilmu Komunikasi, Teori, dan Praktek. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  9. Faiqah, F., Nadjib, M., & Amir, A. S. (2016). Youtube Sebagai Sarana Komunikasi Bagi Komunitas Makassarvidgram. Jurnal Komunikasi KAREBA, 5(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.31947/kjik.v5i2.1905
  10. Fathiyyah, R. N., & Rina, N. (2019). Pengaruh Kredibilitas Youtuber Terhadap Sikap Penonton Pada Channel Youtube Atta Halilintar. 15(2), 98–118. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.actadiurna.2019.15.2.2135
  11. Harahap, N. (2014). Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jurnal Iqra’, 8(1), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.30829/iqra.v8i1.65
  12. Hitekno.com. (2018). Meresahkan, Ini 5 Berita Hoaks yang Menyebar Selama 2018. Retrieved September 26, 2020, from https://www.hitekno.com/internet/2018/12/27/203000/meresahkan-ini-5-berita-hoaks-yang-menyebar-selama-2018
  13. Irhamdi, M. (2018). Menghadirkan Etika Komunikasi di Media Sosial (Facebook). Komunike, 10(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.20414/jurkom.v10i2.676
  14. Ishaq, S. A. D. S. I. al-‘Ash’af I. (1996). Sunan Abi Dawud. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah.
  15. Jafar, I. (2017). Konsep Berita dalam Al-Qur’an (Implikasinya dalam Sistem Pemberitaan di Media Sosial). Jurnal Jurnalisa, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurnalisa.v3i1.3052
  16. Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society: The communication of idea. In New York. New York: Institute for Religious and Social Studies.
  17. Mâjah, I. (n.d.). Sunan Ibnu Mâjah, Jilid 2. t.kt.: Dâr Ahyâ al-Kitab al-‘Arabiyyah.
  18. Margono. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
  19. Marwan, I. (2013). Rasa Humor dalam Perspektif Agama. Buletin Al-Turas, 19(2), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v19i2.3720
  20. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis (a Source book of New Methods). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
  21. Mirzaqon, A., & Purwoko, B. (2018). Studi Kepustakaan Mengenai Landasan Teori Dan Praktik Konseling Expressive Writing. Jurnal BK UNESA, 8(1), 1–8. Retrieved from https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-bk-unesa/article/view/22037
  22. Muslimah. (2016). Etika komunikasi dalam persfektif islam. Sosial Budaya, 13(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.24014/sb.v13i2.3534
  23. Novianti, R. D., Sondakh, M., & Rembang, M. (2017). Komunikasi Antar Pribadi Dalam Menciptakan Harmonisasi (Suami dan Istri) Keluarga di Desa Sagea Kabupaten Halmahera Tengah. Acta Diurna, 6(2), 1–15. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/actadiurnakomunikasi/article/view/16203
  24. Nurasih, W., Rasidin, M., & Witro, D. (2020). Islam dan etika bermedia sosial bagi generasi milenial: Telaah surat al-’Asr. Al-Mishbah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 16(1), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.24239/al-mishbah.Vol16.Iss1.194
  25. Nurfikria dkk, I. (2019). Representasi Penyandang Disabilitas Psikososial di Kanal Youtube. Yogyakarta: Litera Yogyakarta.
  26. Perdana, S., Tjahyana, L. J., & Aritonang, A. I. (2018). Motif dan kepuasan subscribers menonton video dalam youtube channel Londokampung. Jurnal E-Komunikasi, 6(2), 1–10. Retrieved from http://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/ilmu-komunikasi/article/view/8269
  27. Rasidin, M., Sidqi, I., & Witro, D. (2020). Drop shipping in Islamic economic law perspective: E-commerce study inter marketplace drop ship in the industrial revolution era 4.0. Nurani, 20(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v20i1.6029
  28. Sari, M., & Asmendri, A. (2020). Penelitian Kepustakaan (Library Research) dalam Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. Natural Science: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang IPA Dan Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 41–53. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uinib.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/naturalscience/article/view/1555/1159
  29. Shihab, M. Q. (2012). Tafsir al-Misbah, Vol. 12. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.
  30. Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  31. Sujarweni, V. W. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: PT Pustaka Baru.
  32. Supriyatman, A. T., & Nugroho, C. (2019). Analisis Resepsi Penonton Remaja Video Mukbang dalam Kanal Youtube “Yuka Kinoshita.” E-Proceeding of Management, 6(1), 1428–1440. Retrieved from https://libraryeproceeding.telkomuniversity.ac.id/index.php/management/article/view/8526
  33. Tubbs, S., & Moss, S. (2000). (Penerjemah) Deddy Mulyana. Human Communication. Bandung: Rosda Karya.
  34. van Ruler, B. (2018). Communication Theory: An Underrated Pillar on Which Strategic Communication Rests. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1452240
  35. Viva.co.id. (2019). Jadi Orang Gila, Video Prank Baim Wong jadi Trending No 1. Retrieved September 26, 2020, from https://www.viva.co.id/showbiz/gosip/1115518-jadi-orang-gila-video-prank-baim-wong-jadi-trending-no1
  36. Wales, M. (2016). “It’s Just A Prank, Bro!”: The Deplorable Immorality of YouTube “Prank” Videos. https://doi.org/Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/181320
  37. Watie, E. D. S. (2016). Komunikasi dan Media Sosial (Communications and Social Media). Jurnal The Messenger, 3(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v3i2.270
  38. Wearesocial.com. (2020). Digital 2020: Global Digital Overview. Retrieved May 14, 2020, from https://wearesocial.com/
  39. Witro, D. (2018). Problematika hoax di media sosial: Telaah pesan tabayyun dalam surat al-Hujurat/49: 6. Proceedings of the 3rd BUAF (Borneo Undergraduate Academic Forum), 183–190. Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, 17-19 Oktober: Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangkaraya.
  40. Witro, D. (2019). Peaceful campaign in election al-Hujurat verse 11 perspective. Alfuad:Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Keagamaan, 3(2), 15–24. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/jsk.v3i2.1796
  41. Yusuf, M., Witro, D., Diana, R., Santosa, T. A., Alfikri, A. ’Alwiyah, & Jalwis, J. (2020). Digital parenting to children using the internet. Pedagogik Journal of Islamic Elementary School, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24256/pijies.v3i1.1277