Main Article Content


This study examines the phenomenon of religious and scientific conflicts related to vaccination in the dynamics of handling Covid-19. There are two research problems in this study; How is the religion-science conflict related to the Covid-19 vaccine? How to mediate religion-science conflict in Covid-19 vaccination, from the perspective of Ian G. Barbour? Methodologically, this study uses qualitative research methods. There are two types of data in this study, namely primary data sourced from both print and online media in the period January 2020 to December 2022, and secondary data obtained from library sources. Using Ian G. Barbour's theory of the religion-science relationship, this study finds two important findings; First, one of the crucial problems in the midst of the efforts of many countries to fight the Covid-19 pandemic is the existence of conflict or friction between religious circles and scientists. The friction arose along with the differences in their mindset regarding the prevention and control of Covid-19, in this case the Covid-19 vaccination. In response to this polemic or conflict, it is necessary to have a breakthrough at the level of thought, namely by developing the idea of ​​a middle way, through which sages and clergy can meet, make peace, and compromise with each other. Second, in Iai G. Barbour's perspective, the relationship between religion and science can be mapped into four patterns, namely patterns of conflict, independence, dialogue, and finally the pattern of integration. Of these four patterns, the most ideal approach as a middle ground for religious and scientific conflicts related to Covid-19 vaccination is integration.



The Middle Way, Religion-science conflict, Covid-19 Vaccination, Ian G. Barbour

Article Details

How to Cite
Abd Hannan. (2022). Jalan Tengah Konflik Agama Sains dalam Vaksinasi Covid-19 Perspektif Pemikiran Ian G. Barbour . KURIOSITAS: Media Komunikasi Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 15(1), 43-78.


  1. Alam, S. O. (2021, Agu). Varian Delta Makin Mendominasi, Apa Kabar Herd Immunity? detikHealth.
  2. Antonelli, M., Penfold, R. S., Merino, J., Sudre, C. H., Molteni, E., Berry, S., Canas, L. S., Graham, M. S., Klaser, K., Modat, M., Murray, B., Kerfoot, E., Chen, L., Deng, J., Österdahl, M. F., Cheetham, N. J., Drew, D. A., Nguyen, L. H., Pujol, J. C., … Steves, C. J. (n.d.). Risk Factors And Disease Profile Ff Post-Vaccination Sars-Cov-2 Infection in UK Users of the Covid Symptom Study App: A Prospective, Community-Based, Nested, Case-Control Study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases.
  3. Arifuddin, A. (2015). Konsep Integrasi Ilmu dalam Pandangan Ismail Raji Al-Faruqi. SYAMIL: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam (Journal of Islamic Education), 3(1).
  4. Arjanto, D. (2021, Agustus). Epidemiolog Sebut Herd Immunity Tercapai Jika Efikasi Vaksin 80 Persen ke Atas. Metro Tempo.Co.
  5. Barbour, I. G. (2000). When Science Meets Religion: Enemies, Strangers, or Partners? SPCK.
  6. BBC News. (2021, April 13). Ratusan anak Jerman terlibat dalam kelompok antivaksin, apa penyebabnya? BBC News Indonesia.
  7. BBC News Indonesia. (2021, February 15). Penolak Vaksin covid-19 Kena Kanksi, Epidemiolog: ‘Pemaksaan Tidak Akan Berhasil’. BBC News Indonesia.
  8. BBC Trending. (n.d.). The misinformation bubble threatening Brazil’s indigenous people. BBC News. Retrieved 19 November 2021, from
  9. Boudjelal, M., Almajed, F., Salman, A. M., Alharbi, N. K., Colangelo, M., Michelotti, J. M., Olinger, G., Baker, M., Hill, A. V. S., & Alaskar, A. (2021). Covid-19 Vaccines: Global Challenges and Prospects Forum Recommendations. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 105, 448–451.
  10. de Figueiredo, A., Simas, C., Karafillakis, E., Paterson, P., & Larson, H. J. (2020). Mapping Global Trends in Vaccine Confidence and Investigating Barriers to Vaccine Uptake: A Large-Scale Retrospective Temporal Modelling Study. The Lancet, 396(10255), 898–908.
  11. Dikarma, amran. (2021, April 21). Puluhan Ribu Warga Jerman Tolak Lockdown | Republika Online.
  12. Ecklund, E. H., & Park, J. Z. (2009). Conflict between Religion and Science among Academic Scientists? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(2), 276–292. JSTOR.
  13. Erika Nugraheny, D. (2020, March 19). Penahbisan Uskup Ruteng Tetap Digelar, Johny G Plate. Https://Nasional.Kompas.Com/.
  14. Evans, J. (2011). Epistemological and Moral Conflict Between Religion and Science. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50, 707–727.
  15. Evans, J. H., & Evans, M. S. (2008). Religion and Science: Beyond the Epistemological Conflict Narrative. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 87–105.
  16. Ferré, F. (1983). Ian G. Barbour: Technology, Environment and Human Values. Environmental Ethics, 5, 367–370.
  17. Foucault, M. (1961). Madness and Civilization. Librairie Plon.
  18. Galang, J. R. F. (2021). Science and Religion for Covid-19 Vaccine Promotion. Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England), 43(3), e513–e514. PubMed.
  19. Georgiou, G. (2022, January 8). Covid News: Cyprus Finds Variant That Combine Delta and Omicron. Https://Www.Bloomberg.Com/.
  20. Hallanger, N. (2012). Ian G. Barbour (pp. 600–610).
  21. Hannan, A. (2021). The Resistance of Conservative Islamic Organizations on the Development of Regional Tourism in Madura. Jurnal Fuaduna : Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 5, 1.
  22. Hannan, A., Azizah, S., & Atiya, H. (2020). Dinamika Pesantren dalam Merespons Pandemi Covid-19 di Madura. DINIKA : Academic Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(2).
  23. Hannan, A., & Muhaimin, W. (2020). Teologi Kemaslahatan Social-Phsycal Distancing dalam Penanggulangan Covid-19. KURIOSITAS; Media Komunikasi Sosial dan Keagamaan, 13(1), 25.
  24. Hannan, A., Rahmawati, F., & Khairi, A. I. (2020). The Moderatism and Religious Conservatism Problems in the Middle of Covid-19 Pandemic Era. KURIOSITAS; Media Komunikasi Sosial dan Keagamaan, 13(2), 31.
  25. Hannan, A., Syarif, Z., & Yusof, K. A. M. (2021). The Review of Social Theology and Science on the Benefits of Vaccine in the Covid-19 Preventive Measures. Akademika : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 26(2), 219.
  26. Hart, R. (2021, September 5). By The Numbers: Who’s Refusing Covid Vaccinations—and Why. Forbes.
  27. Hilmy, M., & Niam, K. (2020). Winning the Battle of Authorities: The Muslim Disputes Over the Covid-19 Pandemic Plague in Contemporary Indonesia. QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies), 8(2), 293.
  28. Hong, B. A., & Handal, P. J. (2020). Science, Religion, Government, and SARS-CoV-2: A Time for Synergy. Journal of Religion and Health, 59(5), 2263–2268. PubMed.
  29. Institute, T. W. (2021, November 21). Religion and COVID-19 in India ( [Text/html]. The Woolf Institute; The Woolf Institute.
  30. Junaedi, M. (2018). Mengkritisi Tipologi Hubungan Sains dan Agama Ian G. Barbour. Manarul Qur’an: Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Islam, 18, 36–63.
  31. Kanozia, R., & Arya, R. (2021). “Fake news”, religion, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. Media Asia, 48(4), 313–321.
  32. Khudori Soleh, A. (2020). Integrasi Quantum Agama dan Sains. UIN-Maliki Press.
  33. Lee, S., & Oh, S. (2021a). Religion and Public Conflict in the Post-COVID Era: The Case of Protestant Churches in South Korea. Religions, 12(10), 851.
  34. Lee, S., & Oh, S. (2021b). Religion and Public Conflict in the Post-COVID Era: The Case of Protestant Churches in South Korea. Religions, 12(10), 851.
  35. Long, J. (1972). Science, Technology, and Ethics:Science and Secularity: The Ethics of Technology Ian G. Barbour. The Journal of Religion, 52, 438.
  36. McKee, C., & Bohannon, K. (2016). Exploring the Reasons Behind Parental Refusal of Vaccines. The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics : JPPT : The Official Journal of PPAG, 21(2), 104–109. PubMed.
  37. McPhetres, J., & Zuckerman, M. (2018). Religiosity Predicts Negative Attitudes Towards Science and Lower Levels of Science Literacy. PLOS ONE, 13(11), e0207125.
  38. Monserrat, J. (2004). Ian G. Barbour on Science, Philosophy of the Process and God. 60, 33–66.
  39. Narda Chaterine, R. (2022, August 1). UPDATE 8 Januari 2022: Vaksinasi Covid-19 Dosis Kedua Capai 56,04 Persen dari Target. Https://Nasional.Kompas.Com/.
  40. Oviedo, L., & Lumbreras, S. (2021). The Pandemic and Its Influence on the Relationship Between Science, Religion, and Theology. 30, 5–14.
  41. Pawar, M. (2020). The Global Impact of and Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic. The International Journal of Community and Social Development, 2(2), 111–120.
  42. Peterson, G. (2001). The Matter of Religion and Science: Response to Huston Smith. Zygon, 36, 215–222.
  43. Puslitbang kemenag. (2021). Sistem Informasi Manajemen Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kementerian Agama RI. Https://Simlitbangdiklat.Kemenag.Go.Id/.
  44. Pusparisa, Y. (2020, Mei). Klaster Corona dari Ijtima Ulama Gowa. Katadata.Co.Id.
  45. pwn. (2021, October 19). Malaysia Ancam ‘Persulit Hidup’ Warga yang Menolak Divaksin.
  46. Randolph, H. E., & Barreiro, L. B. (2020). Herd Immunity: Understanding COVID-19. Immunity, 52(5), 737–741. PubMed.
  47. Rina Cahyani, D. (2021, November 5). Corona di Eropa Makin Ganas, WHO Ingatkan Waspadai Gelombang Baru Covid-19. Tempo.Co.
  48. Ritchie, A. D. (1949). Some Aspects of the Conflict between Science and Religion. Theology Today, 5(4), 474–487.
  49. Russell, R. (2008). Launching the Ian G. Barbour Lectureship in Religion and Modernity. Theology and Science, 6, 123–125.
  50. Russell, R. (2014). Ian G. Barbour (1923–2013): In Memoriam to the Pioneer of Science and Religion. Theology and Science, 12.
  51. Sabaté Gauxachs, A., Albalad Aiguabella, J. M., & Diez Bosch, M. (2021). Coronavirus-Driven Digitalization of In-Person Communities. Analysis of the Catholic Church Online Response in Spain during the Pandemic. Religions, 12(5), 311.
  52. Sappington, A. A. (1991). The Religion-Science Conflict. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30(1), 114–120. JSTOR.
  53. Shults, F. L. (2001). When Science Meets Religion: Enemies, Strangers or Partners? By Ian G. Barbour. Theology Today, 58, 434–435.
  54. Siegler, M., & Osmond, H. (1966). Models of Madness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 112(493), 1193–1203. Cambridge Core.
  55. Siemaszko, C. (2021, April 23). Divine Intervention: Pastors Tapped to Help Get Skeptical Churchgoers Vaccinated. NBC News.
  56. Smith, H. (2003). Huston Smith Replies to Barbour, Goodenough, and Peterson. Zygon®, 36, 223–231.
  57. Syarif, Z., & Abd, H. (2021). Moderatism Paradigm of COVID-19 Prevention: Religion-Science Integration Perspective. Dialogia, 19(2).
  58. Syarif, Z., & Hannan, A. (2021). Fundamentalism and the Challenges of Religious Moderation in the New Normal Era. Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 25(1).
  59. (2008, May 13). Einstein Writes of ‘Childish Superstition’. The Guardian.
  60. Umam, M. K. (2019). Integrasi Nilai-Nilai Ke-Islaman dalam Pembelajaran Makhluk Hidup di SMA Mamba’us Sholihin Terpadu Blitar. . . Volume, 03, 12.
  61. Visaria, A., & Dharamdasani, T. (2021). The complex causes of India’s 2021 COVID-19 surge. The Lancet, 397(10293), 2464.
  62. (2021, September 7). COVID-19 Vaccines: From Rejection to Shortage, How Côte D’Ivoire Became a Model for Managing Vaccine Hesitancy. World Bank.
  63. (2022, January 22). Worldometers info. Https://Www.Worldometers.Info/.
  64. Yarnold, G. (1968). Book Review:Issues in Science and Religion Ian G. Barbour. Journal of Religion, 48.
  65. Yigit, M., Ozkaya-Parlakay, A., & Senel, E. (2021). Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccine Refusal in Parents. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 40(4).
  66. Zenone, M., Snyder, J., Marcon, A., & Caulfield, T. (2022). Analyzing Natural Herd Immunity Media Discourse in the United Kingdom and the United States. PLOS Global Public Health, 2(1), e0000078.