Main Article Content

Abstract

Sustainable development is currently not only measured by the economic growth of a country or region but goes further than that. One of them, through the stability and maintenance of the environment. This study aims to look at the relationship between green financing, economic growth, trade barriers and CO2 emissions specifically in countries that are members of the OIC cooperation. This study uses a quantitative approach with a panel data estimation model with the help of testing using the eviews 9 statistical application. Samples were used in 8 countries namely Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Sudan and Saudi Arabia, with sample fees using purposive example. Furthermore, data was obtained from the official website of the world bank and the Islamic Financial Service Board (IFSB). The peculiarity of this research is that it shows that environmentally friendly financing, economic growth and the rise of trading have a positive effect on CO2 emissions. The results of this study confirm that development policies in several OIC member countries have had a significant impact on pollution in these countries and the presence of Islamic banks through financing in the green economy sector has not shown an impact that can reduce CO2 emissions.

Keywords

Green FinancingEconomic GrowthTrade OpennessCO2 Emissions

Article Details

How to Cite
Herianto, Tenri Lala, A. A. T. L., & Nurpasila. (2025). Pengaruh Green Fiance, Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Keterbukaan Perdagangan Terhadap Emisi CO2 Bukti dari Negara Anggota OKI: The Effect of Green Fiance, Economic Growth and Trade Openness on CO2 Emissions Evidence from OIC Member Countries. Balanca : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, 6(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.35905/balanca.v6i2.7895

References

  1. Adisasmita, R. (2013). Teori-teori pembangunan ekonomi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 15.
  2. Agency IE. Net Zero Emissions. https://www.iea.org. 2022
  3. Aktar, M. A., Alam, M. M., & Al-Amin, A. Q. (2021). Global economic crisis, energy use, CO2 emissions, and policy roadmap amid COVID-19. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 770–781.
  4. Brahmbhatt, M., Haddaoui, C., & Page, J. (2017). Green industrialisation and entrepreneurship in Africa. Contributing Paper for African Economic Outlook, 1–60.
  5. Espejo, W., Celis, J. E., Chiang, G., & Bahamonde, P. (2020). Environment and COVID-19: Pollutants, impacts, dissemination, management and recommendations for facing future epidemic threats. Science of the Total Environment, 747, 141314.
  6. Farabi, A., & Abdullah, A. (2020). Environmental degradation in Indonesia and Malaysia: The effect of energy consumption, economic growth, population, and foreign direct investment (FDI). Journal of Theory and Applied Management, 13, 160–177.
  7. Fernández-Amador, O., Oberdabernig, D. A., & Tomberger, P. (2022). Do methane emissions converge? Evidence from global panel data on production-and consumption-based emissions. Empirical Economics, 63(2), 877–900.
  8. Ghazouani, T., Boukhatem, J., & Sam, C. Y. (2020). Causal interactions between trade openness, renewable electricity consumption, and economic growth in Asia-Pacific countries: Fresh evidence from a bootstrap ARDL approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 133, 110094.
  9. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of economic research Cambridge, Mass., USA.
  10. Gujarati Damodar, N. (2012). Basic econometrics 4th Edition. McGraw-Hill.
  11. Https://www.oic-oci.org. Member States of organisation of islamic cooperation. oic-oci.org. 2022.
  12. Karedla, Y., Mishra, R., & Patel, N. (2021). The impact of economic growth, trade openness and manufacturing on CO2 emissions in India: an autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) bounds test approach. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 26(52), 376–389.
  13. Mahmood, H., Alkhateeb, T. T. Y., & Furqan, M. (2020). Exports, imports, foreign direct investment and CO2 emissions in North Africa: Spatial analysis. Energy Reports, 6, 2403–2409.
  14. Mikayilov, J. I., Galeotti, M., & Hasanov, F. J. (2018). The impact of economic growth on CO2 emissions in Azerbaijan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1558–1572.
  15. Pao, H.-T., & Tsai, C.-M. (2011). Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy, 36(1), 685–693.
  16. Rajagukguk, W. (2015). Hubungan degradasi lingkungan dan pertumbuhan ekonomi: kasus Indonesia.
  17. Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J., & Mohd, S. (2012). Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy, 51, 184–191.
  18. Shahbaz, M., Hye, Q. M. A., Tiwari, A. K., & Leitão, N. C. (2013). Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 109–121.
  19. Sharma, S. S. (2011). Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: empirical evidence from 69 countries. Applied Energy, 88(1), 376–382.
  20. Tang, E. (2018). Pengaruh penanaman modal asing, pendapatan domestik bruto, konsumsi energi, konsumsi listrik, dan konsumsi daging terhadap kualitas lingkungan pada 41 negara di dunia dan 17 negara di Asia periode 1999-2013. CALYPTRA, 6(2), 1896–1914.
  21. Tran, Q. H. (2022). The impact of green finance, economic growth and energy usage on CO2 emission in Vietnam–a multivariate time series analysis. China Finance Review International, 12(2), 280–296.
  22. Widarjono, A. (2018). Pengantar dan Aplikasinya Disertai Panduan Eviews. Buku Ekonometrika. Edisi, 5.