Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 10, 2020
Accepted
May 18, 2020
Published
May 28, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 274 Download : 394

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study discusses the influence of Quality of Work Life conducted by Bank Danamon Syariah Makassar. Quality of Work Life is a management concern about how work can affect humans, organizational effectiveness and the importance of employee participation in decision making processes, especially those related to career, income and time. front of them in their work. The purpose of this research is to find out whether the effect of Quality of Work Life consisting of Rewards System, Work Environment, and Work Restructuring variables influences employee performance. And to find out the dominant variables simultaneously influencing.


This research is a quantitative research with descriptive method. The data collection is done through the distribution of questionnaires. The method used to test hypotheses is to use Validity Test, Reliability Test, Normality Test, Multiple Regression Analysis, T Test, F Test, Adjusted R Square, and Double R Correlation.


Linear regression test results, Y = 11,976 + 0.488 x 1 + 0.081 x 2 + 0.033 x 3, it can be concluded that the variable X1 is the Rewards System that has a value of 0.488 and has a positive and significant effect on employee performance variables (Y), variable X2, namely Environment Work with a value of 0.081 does not have a positive and significant effect on the Employee Performance variable (Y), variable X3, namely Work Restructuring, which has a value of 0.033, does not have a positive and significant effect on the employee performance variable (Y). The results of this study indicate: based on the t (partial) calculation of the reward system, the calculated value is 3.450 and the value (sig) = 0.002 is smaller than the probability value that is 0.05 or 0.002 <0.05, meaning that the dominant reward system variable has a positive and significant effect on employee performance at Bank Danamon Syariah Makassar. T-test results (partial) work environment obtained a calculated value of 0.650 and (sig) = 0.521 greater than the probability that is, 0.05 or 0.521> 0.05 means that the work environment variable does not affect the performance of employees at Bank Danamon Syariah Makassar. And the t-test results (partial) work restructuring obtained a calculated value of 0.239 and (sig) = 0.813 greater than the probability of 0.05 or 0.813> 0.05 which means the work restructuring variable has no effect on employee performance at Bank Danamon Syariah Makassar

Keywords

Sistem ImbalanLingkungan KerjaRestrukturisasi KerjaKinerja

Article Details

How to Cite
Al Qadri, S., Soumena, M. Y., & Zubair, M. K. (2020). Pengaruh Quality Of Work Life (Qwl) terhadap Kinerja Pegawai di Bank Danamon Syariah Makassar. BANCO: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Perbankan Syariah, 2(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.35905/banco.v2i1.1347
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aljuhri, M. (2012). Pengaruh Kualitas Kehidupan Kerja Dan Lingkungan Kerja Sekolah Terhadap Motivasi
  2. Berprestasi. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 14(1).
  3. Anonim. (2017). BANK DALAM PENGAWASAN KHUSUS (SPECIAL SURVEILLANCE).
  4. Https://Www.Ojk.Go.Id/Id/Kanal/Perbankan/Pages/Bank-Dalam-Pengawasan-Khusus.Aspx.
  5. Badu Ahmad. (2008). KONDISI BIROKRASI DI INDONESIA DALAM HUBUNGANNYA DENGAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 4.
  6. Fadilla Helmi, A., & Elita, Y. (2013). Efikasi Diri, Sistem Imbalan, dan Berbagi Pengetahuan: Meta-analisis.
  7. Buletin Psikologi, 21(1).
  8. Finthariasari, M., Ekowati, S., Ranidiah, F., Yuniarti, R., & Muchlis, M. (2020). PENGARUH WORK- FAMILY CONFLICT TERHADAP TURNOVER INTENTION MELALUI KOMITMEN ORGANISASI. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 4(3). https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2020.v4.i3.4584
  9. Irawan, F., & Ekapradana, I. G. A. P. (2020). Analisis Valuasi Nilai Pasar Wajar Saham Pt Bank Danamon
  10. Indonesia. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia, 4(2).
  11. Lasmawati, I. I. (2020). Pengaruh Efektivitas Restrukturisasi Organisasi dan Dukungan Organisasi terhadap Komitmen Organisasional serta Dampaknya pada Kinerja Proses Bisnis Internal Perusahaan. Undpad Repository.
  12. Manajemen, M. (2019). Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Dan
  13. Kewirausahaan, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.24912/jmbk.v2i3.4838
  14. Mega Yunika, R. M. (2017). Pengaruh Restrukturisasi Organisasi Dan Pengawasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja
  15. Karyawan Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Jurnal Manajemen, 5(2).
  16. Muhammad Idris. D.M. (2018). PERANAN ORGANISASI TERHADAP PRILAKU INDIVIDU, DISIPLIN DAN MOTIVASI YANG BERDAMPAK MEMBANGUN KINERJA. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Finansial Indonesia, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.31629/jiafi.v1i2.1246
  17. Murtiyani, S. (2016). Restrukturisasi Sistem Dan Optimalisasi Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Miskin pada Sektor Mikro. Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 14(1).
  18. Paramarta, V. (2019). PENGARUH DISIPLIN TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PADA PT. BANK DANAMON, TBK. CABANG BANDUNG. Jurnal Ekonomi Efektif, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.32493/jee.v1i4.10709
  19. Putri, A. R. (2015). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Pada Bank Umum Konvensional Dan Bank Umum Syariah Di
  20. Indonesia. In Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah (Vol. 3, Issue 1).
  21. Rahayu, Y. (2018). PENGUKURAN HAK INVESTOR DARI HASIL KINERJA. EKUITAS (Jurnal
  22. Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 7(4). https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2003.v7.i4.368
  23. Rizki, M., Parashakti, R. D., & Saragih, L. (2019). The effect of transformational leadership and organizational culture towards employees’ innovative behaviour and performance. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/208
  24. Rokhayati, I., Cahyo, H., & Mulwati, E. (2020). Analisis Rasio Ineternal Perusahaan Yang Berpengaruh
  25. Terhadap Profitabilitas Pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Perbankan Konvensional. Jurnal MONEX, 9(2).
  26. Saputro, A. (2019). BUSINESS ETHIC & GOOG CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (GCG) PADA PT BANK DANAMON INDONESIA Tbk. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.31933/jemsi.v1i2.63
  27. Setiawan, A. (2021). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Penataan Struktur Organisasi Kementerian dalam Rangka Peningkatan Reformasi Birokrasi. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v10i2.2313
  28. Soepomo, P. (2013). Model Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kelayakan Pemberian Kredit. JSTIE (Jurnal Sarjana Teknik Informatika) (E-Journal), 1(1).
  29. Suharyanto, Nugrahanto, B., & Rum, A. I. (2012). Sistem Upah Berbasis Kinerja , Merangsang Karyawan
  30. Lebih Giat Bekerja? Tedc, 6(2).
  31. Trimaya, A. (2014). Pemberlakuan Upah Minimum dalam Sistem Pengupahan Nasional untuk Meningkatkan
  32. Kesejahteraan Tenaga Kerja. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 5(1).
  33. Warpindyastuti, L. D. (2020). Nilai Bisnis Implementasi Sistem Informasi Perbankan ICBS (Integrated Computerized Banking System) Pada Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk. JABE (Journal of Applied Business and Economic), 6(3). https://doi.org/10.30998/jabe.v6i3.3520