Main Article Content

Abstract





This research examines the implementation of Article 378 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) in handling cases of fraud in adulterated rice trading in Palangka Raya City using an empirical juridical research method. The study aims to analyze the application of criminal fraud provisions to adulterated rice trading practices and to identify the obstacles faced by law enforcement authorities in its implementation. The empirical juridical method is employed by combining a normative approach to Article 378 of the Criminal Code with field research through the collection of case data that occurred in Palangka Raya. The research findings indicate that, normatively, Article 378 of the Criminal Code is highly relevant to be applied in cases of adulterated rice, as it fulfills all elements of fraud, namely the intention to unlawfully benefit oneself, the use of deception through fake packaging and labels, and inducing consumers to hand over their money. However, empirically, implementation in Palangka Raya City faces significant obstacles, including difficulties in proving the element of intent on the part of the perpetrator, low public participation in reporting, weak inter‑agency coordination, limited resources, and an ever‑evolving modus operandi. Law enforcement authorities often prefer to use the Consumer Protection Law and the Food Law, which impose heavier sanctions. The research concludes that effective law enforcement requires the improvement of technology‑based supervision systems, strengthening coordination through special task forces, enhancing the capacity of law enforcement officers, building easily accessible reporting infrastructure, and harmonizing regulations between general criminal law and special laws in order to protect consumers from fraudulent practices in adulterated rice trading.





Keywords

Article 378 Criminal CodeAdulterated Rice Fraud Palangka Raya

Article Details

How to Cite
nababan, jessica, Suriani, R., & F. Dewi, Y. (2026). Beyond Criminality: Socio-Legal Dimensions and Fiqh Perspectives on Adulterated Rice Trading Practices in Contemporary Palangka Raya . DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 24(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v24i2.15433

References

    A. Books
    • Chazawi, Adami. 2016. Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Benda. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
    • Lamintang, P.A.F. 2018. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
    • Moeljatno. 2015. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
    • Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. 2014. Tindak-Tindak Pidana Tertentu di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
    • Soekanto, Soerjono and Sri Mamudji. 2015. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

    B. Legislation
    • Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).
    • Indonesia. Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1999 Number 42.
    • Indonesia. Law Number 18 of 2012 on Food. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2012 Number 227.
    • Indonesia. Law Number 8 of 1981 on the Law of Criminal Procedure (KUHAP). State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1981 Number 76.

    C. Journal Articles
    • Arifin, Ridwan and Lilis Eka Lestari. 2019. "Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Bahan Pangan Tidak Memenuhi Standar." Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 245–260.
    • Asri, Dwi Putri Lestari. 2020. "Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dalam Jual Beli Online Menurut Pasal 378 KUHP." Jurnal Hukum Sasana, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 89–104.
    • Bahri, Syaiful. 2021. "Implementasi Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Dalam Transaksi E-Commerce." Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 326–339.
    • Dewi, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi and I Ketut Suardita. 2022. "Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Akibat Peredaran Beras Palsu." Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 10 No. 5, pp. 1089–1100.
    • Fauzi, Muhammad Lutfi. 2023. "Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dalam Perdagangan Beras Oplosan Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam." Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 78–95.
    • Harahap, Rizky Ramadhan. 2022. "Penerapan Pasal 378 KUHP Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Jual Beli Online." Jurnal Rectum, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 312–325.
    • Hasibuan, Muhammad Ridho. 2021. "Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan Menurut Pasal 378 KUHP." Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 567–580.
    • Hidayat, Arif and Edi Setiadi. 2023. "Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perlindungan Konsumen Produk Pangan." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 145–165.
    • Kristian. 2020. "Urgensi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Konsumen." Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 165–180.
    • Mahendra, I Putu Gede and Ni Made Ari Yuliartini Griadhi. 2023. "Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Terhadap Penjualan Beras Oplosan Di Pasar Tradisional." Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 401–415.
    • Nasution, Bahder Johan. 2022. "Kajian Filosofis Tentang Konsep Keadilan Dari Pemikiran Klasik Sampai Pemikiran Modern." Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 118–130.
    • Pratama, Denny Yoga and Eko Soponyono. 2021. "Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Melalui Media Elektronik." Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 216–229.
    • Purnamasari, Dian. 2023. "Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Pasal 378 KUHP Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan Berkedok Investasi." Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Reusam, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 34–48.
    • Rahayu, Sri and Angkasa. 2022. "Implementasi Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Peredaran Produk Pangan Ilegal." Jurnal Law Reform, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 89–107.
    • Rahmi, Atikah. 2021. "Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana di Bidang Pangan." Legitima: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 56–71.
    • Saputra, Andi Ilham and Muhadar. 2023. "Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli." Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 112–128.
    • Siahaan, N.H.T. 2020. "Perlindungan Konsumen dan Tanggung Jawab Produk." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 245–262.
    • Siregar, Tumpal Parsaulian. 2022. "Analisis Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri)." Jurnal Rectum: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 78–92.

    D. Online Articles and Mass Media
    • Konten Kalteng. 2025. "Membaca Licik, Modus Beras Oplosan Merek 'JDR Premium' di Palangka Raya, Akhirnya Dibongkar Polisi." https://kontenkalteng.com (accessed 9 November 2025).
    • ANTARA News Kalimantan Barat. 2025. "Polisi Ringkus Penjual Beras Palsu di Palangka Raya." https://antaranews.com (accessed 9 November 2025).
    • Berita Borneo. 2025. "Satgas Pangan Ungkap Beras Palsu di Palangka Raya." https://beritaborneo.com (accessed 9 November 2025).
    • Kompas.com. 2025. "7 Produk Beras Oplosan Ditemukan di Palangka Raya, LPK Desak Penjual Dipidana." https://kompas.com (accessed 9 November 2025).
    • Provincial Government of Central Kalimantan. 2025. "Tindak Lanjut Isu Beras Oplosan, Pemprov Kalteng Ambil Langkah Tegas." https://kalteng.go.id (accessed 9 November 2025).
    • Palangka Raya City Government. 2025. "Report! If You Find Adulterated Rice." https://palangkaraya.go.id (accessed 9 November 2025).