Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 26, 2025
Accepted
January 3, 2026
Published
January 3, 2026
Download
Pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract





Background:   Money politics remains one of the most persistent challenges undermining democratic consolidation in Indonesia, particularly at the local level where patron–client relationships and economic vulnerability converge. Despite the introduction of electoral reforms and stricter legal frameworks, vote buying continues to shape the outcomes of legislative elections across many regions .


Purpose:  This study investigates the dynamics of money politics in the legislative elections of Wajo Regency, South Sulawesi, focusing on the continuity and transformation of practices between the 2019 and 2024 electoral cycles. Employing a qualitative case study design, the research explores the socio-economic, cultural, and institutional factors that sustain transactional politics in local elections .


Methods:   Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, focus group discussions, and document analysis involving candidates, campaign teams, voters, government officials, and election observers. The analysis is guided by the theoretical frameworks of patron–client relations, rational choice theory, and system theory to explain how individual behavior, institutional weaknesses, and socio-cultural norms interact to normalize money politics .


Originality:    By situating Wajo as a microcosm of Indonesia’s broader electoral challenges, this study contributes to the understanding of how informal political economies persist within formal democratic institutions and provides insights for developing culturally grounded strategies to strengthen electoral integrity in local governance for the customary law. Even though the legal plurality of Indonesian society is directly protected by the constitution.





Keywords

Money PoliticsElectoral IntegrityLocal DemocracyLegislative Elections

Article Details

How to Cite
Jumardin, J., Purwanda, S. ., Syam, E. S., Tijjang, B., & Kairuddin. (2026). Money Politics and Electoral Integrity in Local Democracy: A Case Study of Legislative Elections in Wajo Regency, South Sulawesi (2019–2024). DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 24(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v24i2.16227
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
  2. Aspinall, E., Fossati, D., & Muhtadi, B. (2020). Electoral clientelism in Indonesia: Structure, distribution, and consequences. Pacific Affairs, 93(1), 39–69. https://doi.org/10.5509/202093139
  3. Aspinall, E., & Weiss, M. (2022). Clientelism and democratic decline in Southeast Asia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 52(4), 523–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2021.1973445
  4. Burhanuddin, M. (2019). Vote buying in Indonesia: The mechanics of electoral bribery. NUS Press.
  5. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row.
  6. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. Wiley.
  7. Fitriani, N., Yuliani, D., & Rahman, M. (2023). Political literacy and voter rationality in Indonesia’s regional elections. Asian Journal of Political Science, 31(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2023.2194020
  8. Haryanto, T. (2020). Political corruption and rent-seeking in local elections: Evidence from Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 5(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891119876942
  9. Hicken, A., Aspinall, E., & Muhtadi, B. (2022). Patron–client relationships and the persistence of money politics in Southeast Asia. Comparative Politics, 54(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041522X16393051912206
  10. Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. I. (2007). Patrons, clients, and policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford University Press.
  12. Mueller, D. C. (2019). Public choice III. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Muhtadi, B. (2019). Vote buying in Indonesia: The mechanics of electoral bribery. NUS Press.
  14. Muhtadi, B. (2022). Money politics and the moral economy of elections in Indonesia. Asian Survey, 62(5), 815–840. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2022.62.5.815
  15. Noor, F. (2018). Money politics and democratic degradation in Indonesia’s legislative elections. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 15(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v15i1.803
  16. Prabowo, H., & Cooper, K. (2022). Electoral integrity and corruption in Indonesia: Governance challenges at the local level. Public Integrity, 24(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2020.1818468
  17. Tenri, A. (2021). Patterns of money politics in local legislative elections in South Sulawesi. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 8(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.8.2.2021.67-81
  18. Warburton, E. (2023). Electoral disillusionment and democratic decline in post-reform Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 45(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs45-1b
  19. Yuningsih, N. Y., & Yusoff, M. A. (2020). Political literacy and clientelism in rural Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 16(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2020-1602-10