Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the philosophical meaning of the In Penne Anreang tradition in Bugis Parepare traditional marriages in relation to gender and Islamic law. To reveal the deep meaning of the object being studied, this research is included in the type of ethnographic research with a descriptive qualitative approach. Data obtained through interviews and documentation. The results of the understanding obtained that the meaning of the message contained in several symbols used in the tradition of surrendering penne anreang in Bugis Parepare traditional marriages contains hopes and messages, therefore it needs to be preserved. The philosophy contained in the symbols of surrender of penne anreang in Bugis Parepare traditional marriages is in line with basic principles in Islamic teachings and includes al-'urf al-sah, namely habits that are carried out in society and do not conflict with the principles of Islamic teachings, do not eliminate benefit and does not bring harm to the perpetrators. Judging from the benefit of being at the tahsniyat level, namely knowing the level of needs which if not met, it does not threaten the existence of one of the maqāshid al syariyyah (objectives of Islamic law) and does not cause difficulties.

Keywords

penne anreangmarriage traditionsislamic law

Article Details

How to Cite
Sudirman, M., & Mustaring, M. (2022). Penyerahan Penne Anreang dalam Tradisi Perkawinan Adat Bugis Parepare : Kajian Gender dan Hukum Islam. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 20(2), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v20i2.3351

References

  1. Abi, Al-Imam al Husain bin al-Hajjaj (t. th). Shahih Muslim. Juz. I; Indonesia: Maktabah Dahlan.
  2. Ahmad bin Muhammad al-Zarqa’, Syarh al-Qawa’id al-Fiqhiyah, Cet. Viii, Beirut: al-Qalam, 1988.
  3. Ahmad, Abd. Kadir, Sistem Perkawinan Sulawesi Selatan dan Sulawesi Batar, Makassar: Indobis, 2006.
  4. Aidid, Hasyim, Islam Nusantara Sinergitas Kearifan Lokal Bugis Makassar, Makassar: Alauddin University Press, 2017.
  5. al-Zarqa, Muḥammad. “’. Syarh Al-Qawā ‘id Al-Fiqhiyyah.” Damsyiq: Dār al-Qalam, 1998.
  6. An-Na’im, Abdullahi Ahmed. Dekonstruksi Syari’ah. IRCISOD, 1994.
  7. Atkinson, Paul, Amanda Coffey, Sara Delamont, John Lofland, and Lyn Lofland. Handbook of Ethnography. Sage, 2001.
  8. Djazuli, Acep, and I Nurol Aen. “Ushul Fiqh Metodologi Hukum Islam.” Cet. I, 2000.
  9. Husaini, S Waqar Ahmad. Sistem Pembinaan Masyarakat Islam, Terj. Anas Mahyuddin, Bandung: Pustaka, 1983.
  10. Idrus, Nurul Ilmi. Gender Relations in an Indonesian Society: Bugis Practices of Sexuality and Marriage. Brill, 2016.
  11. Marlow, Louise. Hierarchy and Egalitarianism in Islamic Thought. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  12. Mattulada, Latoa Suatu Lukisan Analitis terhadap Antropologi Politik Orang Bugis. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia, 1975.
  13. _________, Latoa: Satu Lukisan Analitis Terhadap Antropologi Politik Orang Bugis, Ujungpandang: Hasanuddin University Press, 1995.
  14. Makkulau, M. M. Farid W. Upacara Adat Mappacing. Yayasan Kebudayaan Andi Makkulau: Makassar, 2008.
  15. Mukhtar Yahya, Fathurrahman, Dasar-Dasar Pembinaan Hukum Islam, Cet. IV; Bandung: PT. Al-Ma’arif, 1997.
  16. Najib, Agus Moh. “Reestablishing Indonesian Madhhab ’Urf and the Contribution of Intellectualism1.” Al-Jami’ah 58, no. 1 (2020): 171–208. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2020.581.171-208.
  17. Rahman, Nurhayati. Cinta, Laut, Dan Kekuasaan Dalam Epos La Galigo: Perspektif Filologi Dan Semiotik. La Galigo Press, 2006.
  18. Rahmatunnair, Rahmatunnair. “Kontekstualisasipangngadereng Dalam Penegakan Syart At Islam Pad A Masyarakat Bugis Bone Contextualization of Pangngadereng in the Enforcement of Islamic Shqriah in Bugineese Bone Community.” Al-Qalam 17, no. 1 (2011): 93–101.
  19. Sajuti Thalib, Reception A Contrario, Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1982.
  20. Soerjono, Soekanto. “Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar, Edisi Baru Ke-4.” Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 1990.
  21. Sudirman, M. “PERNIKAHAN ADAT BUGIS ( Suatu Kajian Perspektif Hukum Islam ).” El-USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 2, no. 2 (2019): 1–28.
  22. Surojo, Pengantar dan Asas-Asas Hukum Adat. Jakarta: Gunung Agung, 1985.
  23. Uman, Chaerul, Ushul Fiqih, Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2000.