Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 22, 2023
Accepted
December 25, 2023
Published
December 25, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 43 Download : 37

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study seeks to analyze and contrast the fiqh provisions and legal regulations pertaining to a wife's right to seek divorce in Indonesia and Syria, specifically in cases where the husband is absent. The author aims to employ a normative approach and comparative approaches, together with data analytic techniques like as text analysis, to identify both parallels and discrepancies between fiqh provisions and laws in Indonesia and Syria. Indonesian and Syrian state legislation predominantly aligns with the viewpoints of the Shafi'i, Hanbali, and Maliki schools of thought, which permit the possibility of challenging a divorce on the grounds of the husband's absence. From the two countries, specifically Indonesia and Syria. Indonesia has established the record for the greatest duration of being missing or unseen, spanning two continuous years. Subsequently, Syria undergoes a period of absence or invisibility lasting for one year. During the specified timeframe for assessing the divergence between the nations of Indonesia and Syria, the majority of individuals have not adhered to the teachings of the fiqh scholars. The Shafi'i, Hanbali, and Maliki schools establish a four-year time frame within which a wife may wait for her missing husband. Both Indonesia and Syria share similar provisions regarding the dissolution of a marriage due to an absent husband. Specifically, they consider an absent husband as one of the reasons that can lead to the termination of a marriage. Additionally, these countries also prohibit a wife whose husband is absent from remarrying until a court decision has been made.

Keywords

Abandoned HusbandFiqhIndonesianSyrian

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahmawati, D., Trigiyatno, A., Faqih, M. I., Arifudin, M., Mufid, A., & Aland, A. O. (2023). Unveiling Legal and Religious Divergence: Abandoned Husband Divorce in Indonesian and Syrian Contexts. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 21(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v21i2.5764
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdal-Haqq, Irshad. 2002. “Islamic Law-an Overview of Its Origin and Elements.” J. Islamic L. & Culture 7: 27.
  2. Al-Bugha, Hasan, and Musthafa Al-Bugha. 2018. Qanun Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah. Syrian Arab Republic: Syrian Virtual University (SVU).
  3. Alfarez, Muhamad Fascal. n.d. “STATUS HUKUM MAFQUD (ORANG HILANG) PERSPEKTIF MAZHAB SYAFI’I DAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA.” Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
  4. Asmawi, Mohammad. 2004. “Nikah Dalam Perbincangan Dan Perbedaan.” Yogyakarta: Darussalam 19.
  5. Ayubi, Zahra. 2015. “Gendered Morality: Masculinity, Marriage, and Social Relations in Premodern Islamic Ethics.”
  6. Azman, Nur Aina Yasmin Binti Noor. 2020. “STATUS HUKUM PERKAWINAN ISTERI YANG MEMILIKI SUAMI MAFQUD MENURUT IMAM HANAFI DAN IMAM MALIK.” Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.
  7. Ceria, Septifa Leiliano. 2020. “Sharī’ah and the Development of Sakinah Family.” Ulumuddin Journal of Islamic Legal Studies 1 (2).
  8. Djawas, Mursyid, Gamal Achyar, Nursyirwan Bustanul Arifin, Masri Reza, and Baharuddin Umar Yakub. 2022. “The Legal Position of Children of Incest (A Study of Madhhab Scholars and Compilation of Islamic Law).” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6 (1): 139–55.
  9. Fardiana, Farahsyinta Gladisia Puspa, Khoirul Hidayah, and Mohd Hazim bin Borhan. 2022. “A Comparative Analysis of the Missing (Mafqud) Husband Regulations in Indonesia and Malaysia: A Study to Reform the Regulation That Meets Legal Certainty in Indonesia.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syari’ah 14 (3): 359–79.
  10. Fauzi, Rahmad, Muhammad Amar Adly, and Heri Firmansyah. 2023. “The Law Of Exchanging Pulsa Into Money Using The Ibn Hazm Factors For Judges To Consider In Deciding To Cancel A Marriage In The Medan Religious Courts 2018-2022.” JHSS (JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES) 7 (1): 398–406.
  11. Hafifi, Ikmal. 2021. “Status Istri Mafqud Dalam Pandangan Imam Syafi’i Dan Ibnu Qudamah (Studi Komparatif Pendapat Imam Syafi’I Dan Ibnu Qudamah).” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 4 (2): 527–45.
  12. Harry Kurniawan, M H. 2018. “Penentuan Status Hukum Mafqud Ditinjau Dari Prespektif Imam Mazhab.” Al-Mursalah 2 (1).
  13. Hasbi, Ridwan, and Syafaruddin Hasbi. 2016. “THE LEGALITY OF DIVORCE IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF HADITH.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 24 (1): 51–66.
  14. Hidayatulloh, Dian. 2019. “Analisis Pendapat Ulama Tentang Status Hukum Suami Mafqud (Studi Komparatif Madzhab Hanafi Dan Madzhab Syafi’i).” UIN SMH BANTEN.
  15. Hinchcliffe, Doreen. 1971. The Islamic Law of Marriage and Divorce in India and Pakistan Since Partition. University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies (United Kingdom).
  16. Linawati, Iis, Dian Septiandani, and Efi Yulistyowati. 2017. “Fasakh Perkawinan Karena Istri Mengalami Gangguan Jiwa : Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Pati No. 1899/Pdt.G/2013/PA.Pt.” HUMANI (Hukum Dan Masyarakat Madani) 7 (3): 188.
  17. Maktabi, Rania. 2010. “Gender, Family Law and Citizenship in Syria.” Citizenship Studies 14 (5): 557–72.
  18. Mallarangeng, Andi Bau, and Ismail Ali. 2023. “Komparasi Pemikiran Mazhab Syafi’i Dengan Pasal 199 KUHPerdata Terhadap Perkawinan Wanita Yang Suaminya Mafqud.” Legal Journal of Law 2 (2): 1–10.
  19. Mashhour, Amira. 2005. “Islamic Law and Gender Equality: Could There Be a Common Ground?: A Study of Divorce and Polygamy in Sharia Law and Contemporary Legislation in Tunisia and Egypt.” Human Rights Quarterly, 562–96.
  20. Mayer, Ann Elizabeth. 2018. Islam and Human Rights: Tradition and Politics. Routledge.
  21. Mulyawan, Fitra. 2019. “Pelaksanaan Penyelesaian Perkara Cerai Gugat Dengan Alasan Suami Di Penjara.” RANAH REASEARCH : Journal of Multidicsip[Inary Reasearch and Development 1 (4): 850–59.
  22. Omar, Shagufta. 2007. “Dissolution of Marriage: Practices, Laws and Islamic Teachings.” Policy Perspectives, 91–117.
  23. Rabb, Intisar A. 2011. “The Islamic Rule of Lenity: Judicial Discretion and Legal Canons.” Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 44: 1299.
  24. Rangkuti, Muhammad Yusuf, and Armi Agustar. 2022. “Change in Act Number 16 Of 2019 As An Amendment to Law Number 1 of 1974 Islamic Law and Gender Perspective.” Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundangan-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam 14 (1): 51–62.
  25. Rehman, Javaid. 2007. “The Sharia, Islamic Family Laws and International Human Rights Law: Examining the Theory and Practice of Polygamy and Talaq.” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 21 (1): 108–27.
  26. Riaz, Shehla, and Farkhanda Zia. 2019. “A Comparative Study of Dissolution of Marriage on Account of the Missing Husband (Mafqūd-Ul-Khaber) and Women Problems.” Global Social Sciences Review 4 (1): 175–83.
  27. Setyawan, Edy, Muhammad Chairul Huda, Afif Muamar, Didi Sukardi, and Muhammad Feby Ridho Pangestu. 2023. “Legal Age for Marriage: SDGs and Maslahah Perspectives in Legal Policy Change in Indonesia.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 183–98.
  28. Shiddiqi, Hasbi Ash, and Fajrih Fajrih. 2021. “Suami Mafqud Dan Status Pernikahan Studi Komparatif Antara Mazhab Maliki Dan Mazhab Syafii.” Tabsyir: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Sosial Humaniora 2 (3): 57–69.
  29. Sitompul, ZulFadli Raka, Derliana Tanjung, and Zetria Erma. 2023. “Legal Review of Fasakh Divorce Pledge of Divorce Based on Compilation of Islamic Law.” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 3 (4): 3798–3807.
  30. Trigiyatno, Ali. 2021. “Suami Dipenjara Sebagai Alasan Cerai Gugat; Perspektif Fikih Dan Legislasi Negeri Muslim.” Arena Hukum 14 (2): 390–411. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.10.