Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 22, 2023
Accepted
September 17, 2024
Published
September 17, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The problems of Islamic family law over time, seem increasingly complex. Included in this is nusyūz which so far has been taken for granted by society in the provisions of positive law in Indonesia. This article seeks to examine the problems of nusyūz normativity based on the critical legal studies (CLS) paradigm, namely one of the substitutions for the legal school of realism that is present in the classification of the post-modern era of law. There are two main topics of discussion: First, the ratio legis of nusyūz in Indonesian legislation from a CLS perspective; and Second, the reformulation of the upcoming nusyūz law in marriage legislation in Indonesia. This article argues that the ratio legis nusyūz in Indonesian legislation in terms of the trashing, deconstruction, and genealogy approaches of CLS still has a legal construction that is not in favor of justice and social interests as well as the reformulation of the upcoming nusyūz law in marriage legislation in Indonesia based on a philosophical, sociological, and juridical foundation can be implemented through the formation of new laws in the form of laws governing marriage law or Islamic material law or by making changes or revisions to the Compilation of Islamic Law.

Keywords

ReformulationNusyuzCritical Legal Studies

Article Details

How to Cite
Alviani, F. M., & Nizam, N. (2024). Legal Reformulation of Nusyūz in Marriage From The Perspective of Critical Legal Studies. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 22(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v22i1.7315
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Atmadja, I. D. G. (2018). Asas-Asas Hukum Dalam Sistem Hukum. Jurnal Kertha Wicaksana, 12(2), 52.
  2. Atmadja, I. D. G., & Budiartha, I. N. P. (2018). Teori-Teori Hukum. Setara Press.
  3. Bahasa, B. P. dan P. (2016). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI): Kamus Versi Online/ Daring (Dalam Jaringan). Kbbi.Web.Id.
  4. Bedong, M. A. R. (2018). Metodologi Ijtihad Imam Mujtahidin (Corak Pemikiran Dan Aliran). Al-Adl, 11(2), 130–148.
  5. Black, H. C. (1968). Black’s Law Dictionary: Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern (T. P. E. Staff (ed.); Revised Fo). West Publishing.
  6. Dimyati, K. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Sekolah Pascasarjana Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
  7. Dyrda, A. (2018). The Real Ratio Legis and Where to Find It. In V. Klappstein & M. Dybowski (Eds.), Ratio Legis: Philosophical and Theoretical Perspective (p. 1). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74271-7
  8. Efendi, J. (2018). Rekonstruksi Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Hukum dan Rasa Keadilan yang Hidup dalam Masyarakat. Prenadamedia Group.
  9. Fadjar, A. M. (2014). Teori-Teori Hukum Kontemporer. Setara Press.
  10. Ilma, M. (2019). Kontekstualisasi Konsep Nusyuz di Indonesia. Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 30(1), 47–74.
  11. Indonesia, D. J. B. P. A. M. A. R. (2021). Laporan Pelaksanaan Kegiatan.
  12. Indrati, M. F. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan 2: Proses dan Teknik Pembentukannya (Cet Ke-6). Kanisius.
  13. Islamiyati. (2013). Tinjauan Yuridis tentang Relasi Suami-Istri Menurut KHI Inpres No. 1/1991. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 42(3), 369–375.
  14. K, L., Sambas, & Alfin. (2016). Teori-Teori Hukum Klasik dan Kontemporer. Ghalia Indonesia.
  15. Kelsen, H. (2011). General Theory of Law and State (R. Muttaqien (ed.); Terjemahan). Russel and Russel.
  16. Khair, A. (2016). Telaah Kritis Counter Legal Draft Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Reorientasi Fikih Hukum Keluarga Islam Indonesia). Al-Risalah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 1(1), 21–37.
  17. Khon, A. M. (2013). Ikhtisar Tarikh Tasyri’: Sejarah Pembinaan Hukum Islam dari Masa ke Masa (N. L. Nusroh (ed.)). Amzah.
  18. Maisyal, N. (2016). Reformulasi Hukum Perkawinan Islam Responsif Gender. Muwazah, 8(2), 163–184.
  19. Manan, B. (2004). Hukum Positif Indonesia. FH UII Press.
  20. Mansari; Fatahillah, Z. (2021). Penetapan Nafkah ‘Iddah Melalui Hak Ex Officio Bagi Istri Nusyuz. Jurnal Yudisial, 14(2), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v14i2.432
  21. Muchtar, A. I. S., & Sutarso, E. (2021). Nafkah Bagi Istri Nusyûz Menurut Ibnu Hazm. Istinbath | Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Islam, 16(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.36667/istinbath.v16i2.284
  22. Mupida, S. (2019). Relasi Suami Isteri dalam Konflik Pendidikan Nusyuz Menurut Nash Al-Qur’an dan Hadis. Millah, 18(2), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol18.iss2.art4
  23. Rofiq, A. (2000). Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  24. Sirajuddin, Fatkhurohman, & Zulkarnain. (2015). Legislative Drafting: Pelembagaan Metode Partisipatif dalam Membentuk Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Setara Press.
  25. Suharto, M. (2016). Nusyuz dalam Tinjauan Filsafat Hukum (Studi Pasal 80 dan Pasal 84 Kompilasi Hukum Islam). Universitas Islam Negei Sunan Kalijaga.
  26. Syaroji. (2017). Pengaruh Hadis dalam Ilmu Fiqih dan Teologi (Kajian Tokoh dan Pemikiran Imam Syafii. El-Furqonia, 05(2), 221–233.
  27. Winardi, & Sirajuddin. (2019). Politik Hukum. Setara Press.
  28. Yaniawati, R. P. (2020). Penelitian Studi Kepustakaan (Library Research).