Main Article Content

Abstract

This article endeavors to conduct a comparative and gender-equality-focused analysis of legal policies safeguarding women facing domestic violence in Indonesia and Malaysia. Employing a normative juridical research approach, the study utilizes legal comparison as its methodological framework. Primary, secondary, and other relevant literature data are employed for a descriptive and analytical analysis. The study reveals that Indonesia addresses gender equality in protecting women through Law Number 23 of 2004, while Malaysia relies on the 1994 Domestic Violence Act (Act 521). These legal frameworks not only prescribe criminal sanctions for domestic violence perpetrators but also encompass provisions for victims' psychological, physical, and social recovery. Despite the existence of legal safeguards in both countries, instances of domestic violence persist. Women, often the primary victims, face barriers in reporting or seeking protection due to ingrained social structures, educational factors, economic disparities, and a prevailing patriarchal culture. This phenomenon underscores persistent gender inequality in society. The article contributes by shedding light on the societal reality of ongoing gender inequality, perpetuating domestic violence against women in Indonesia and Malaysia. It advocates for the revision of legal policies pertaining to the protection of women facing domestic violence, grounded in gender equality, to ensure comprehensive safeguarding within the realms of social structure, education, economics, and socio-cultural factors

Keywords

legal policiessafeguardingdomestic violenceDivorce

Article Details

How to Cite
Amiruddin, M. Z. ., Zuhriah, E. ., & Zarapi, N. H. . (2024). Perpetuating Inequality: Barriers and Legal Safeguards for Women in Domestic Violence Situations. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 22(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v22i1.8837

References

    Cindy Mutia Annur. 2023. “Kasus Perceraian Di Indonesia Melonjak Lagi Pada 2022, Tertinggi Dalam Enam Tahun Terakhir.” Https://Databoks.Katadata.Co.Id/Datapublish/2023/03/01/Kasus-Perceraian-Di-Indonesia-Melonjak-Lagi-Pada-2022-Tertinggi-Dalam-Enam-Tahun-Terakhir. 2023. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/03/01/kasus-perceraian-di-indonesia-melonjak-lagi-pada-2022-tertinggi-dalam-enam-tahun-terakhir.
    Galistya, Theresia Mutiara. 2020. “KEKERASAN TERHADAP PEREMPUAN DAN PERCERAIAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF PEMBERDAYAAN PEREMPUAN.” Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya 21 (1): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.26623/jdsb.v21i1.1500.
    Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia. 2022. “ePress : PERANGKAAN PERKAHWINAN DAN PERCERAIAN, MALAYSIA, 2022 / MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE STATISTICS, MALAYSIA 2022.” Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia. 2022. http://epress.penerangan.gov.my/epress/epress/view_acara.php?evt=19429.
    Kusmardani, Alex, Abdulah Syafe’i, Usep Saifulah, and Nurrohman Syarif. 2022. “Faktor-faktor Penyebab Perceraian Dalam Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Antar Madzhab Islam Dan Realita Sosial.” JURNAL SYNTAX IMPERATIF : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan 3 (3): 176. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-imperatif.v3i3.168.
    Muhammad Amin Summa. 2005. “Hukum Keluarga Islam Di Dunia Islam / Muhammad Amin Summa | OPAC Perpustakaan Nasional RI.” 2005. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=659371#.
    Mustafa, Rodiah, and Zaini Nasohah. 2022. “Sorotan Literatur Kesedaran Wanita Bekerjaya Tentang Hak-Hak Selepas Perceraian [Literature Review of Career Women’s Awareness on Post-Divorce Rights].” Jurnal Islam Dan Masyarakat Kontemporari 23 (2): 221–33.
    Mutalib, Hussin. 2008. Islam in Southeast Asia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
    Rahman, Moh. Anas Kholish; Khalid. 2015. Menjadi Muslim Nusantara Rahmatan Lil’Alamin (Ikhtiar Memahami Islam Dalam Konteks KeIndonesiaan). Edited by Labib Muttaqin Siti Rohmah. I. Bantul Yogyakarta: Naila Pustaka.
    Roibin, Roibin Roibin, Ahmad Qiram As-Suvi, Yahya Yahya Abdullah, and Zahrah Salsabillah Ashari. 2023. “Domestifikasi Peran Perempuan Sebagai Representasi Tradisi Patriarki Masa Silam: Sebuah Refleksi Pemikiran Friedrich Engels Dan Fatimah Mernissi.” Marwah: Jurnal Perempuan, Agama Dan Jender 22 (1): 53–71.
    Soerjono Soekanto, Sri Mamudji. 2010. “Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat / Soerjono Soekanto, Sri Mamudji | OPAC Perpustakaan Nasional RI.” 2010. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=582397#.
    Surinto, Wahyudi. 2018. “SAHNYA TALAK DI DEPAN HAKIM: STUDI ANALISIS KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM PASAL 115.” Other, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo. http://eprints.umsida.ac.id/5440/.
    Tohari, Ilham, and Moh. Kholish. 2020. “MAQASID SYARIAH SEBAGAI PIJAKAN KONSEPTUAL DALAM PEMBARUAN HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM INDONESIA.” Arena Hukum 13 (02): 314–28. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01302.7.
    “UU No. 7 Tahun 1984.” n.d. Database Peraturan | JDIH BPK. Accessed January 22, 2024. http://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/46978/uu-no-7-tahun-1984.
    “UUD-1945.Pdf.” n.d. Accessed January 22, 2024. https://www.bkn.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/UUD-1945.pdf.
    Warikum Sumitro, Moh. Anas Kholish, Labib Muttaqin. 2017. Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Barat. Edited by Dymas Yulia Putri K. I. Malang: Setara Press.
    KH. Husein Muhammad. 2020. Poligami. Edited by Muhammad Ali Fakih. I. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.
    ———. 2021. Islam Agama Ramah Perempuan. Edited by Muhammad Ali Fakih. I. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.
    Suhaimi. 2018. “PROBLEM HUKUM DAN PENDEKATAN DALAM PENELITIAN HUKUM NORMATIF.”
    Jurnal YUSTITIA 19 (2): 165–75.
    Al-hidayati, Ibnu Rusydi, Suhendrik. 2022. “Kesetaraan Gender Dalam Pendidikan Islam (Studi Atas
    Pemikiran Fatimah Mernissi).” Journal Islamic Pedagogia 2 (1): 41.
    As-suvi, Ahmad Qiram, and Moh Zainullah. 2022. “Sociology of Law in The Perspective of Roscoe Pound and Donald Black and Its Relevance in The Indonesian Context.” PJLS: Peradaban Journal of Law and Society 1 (2): 82–95.