Main Article Content

Abstract

Ecological intelligence is crucial in enhancing human awareness of environmental issues. However, there is a lack of research on how environmental care attitudes are developed through the learning process in the classroom. This study aims to explore how students perceive environmental care attitudes based on ecological intelligence. The research used a quantitative methodology with a percentage technique and involved 120 students from Madrasah as the sample. Research data were obtained through a closed-ended questionnaire, and the data were analyzed through percentages. The findings show that students possess a high level of environmental care, as evidenced by the highest agreement level in the head (cognition) or learning to know with 89.3%, followed by the heart (affection) or learning to be with 86.5%, and then the hands (conation) or learning to do with 85.6%. The result indicates that students who participate in environmental care activities in school have good ecological intelligence. These results suggest that integrating ecological intelligence into classroom learning can effectively foster environmental care attitudes. Therefore, educators and curriculum developers should consider incorporating more environmental education components into daily instruction. Future research may explore the long-term impact of ecological intelligence-based learning on students’ environmental behavior outside school.

Keywords

ecological intelligenceenvironmental care attitudeenvironmental education

Article Details

Author Biographies

Agung Dwi Bahtiar El Rizaq, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences

Wiwik Sri Utami, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences

A. Fatikhul Amin Abdullah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura

Faculty of Tarbiyah

Sahrul Romadhon, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura

Faculty of Tarbiyah

Mohd Hairy Ibrahim, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Faculty of Humanities Sciences

How to Cite
El Rizaq, A. D. B., Utami, W. S. ., Abdullah, A. F. A. ., Romadhon, S. ., & Ibrahim, M. H. (2025). Analysis of environmental care attitudes based on students’ ecological intelligence. AL MA’ARIEF : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Budaya, 7(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.35905/almaarief.v7i1.12983

References

  1. Abidin, A. R., Irawan, Y., & Devis, Y. (2022). Smart trash bin for management of garbage problem in society. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science (JAETS), 4(1), 202–208.
  2. Adeolu, A., Odipe, O., & Raimi, M. (2018). Practices and knowledge of household residents to lead exposure in indoor environment in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 19(6), 1–10.
  3. Alabi, O. A., Ologbonjaye, K. I., Awosolu, O., & Alalade, O. E. (2019). Public and environmental health effects of plastic wastes disposal: A review. Journal of Toxicology and Risk Assessment, 5(021), 1–13.
  4. Anand, C. K., Bisaillon, V., Webster, A., & Amor, B. (2015). Integration of sustainable development in higher education – A regional initiative in Quebec (Canada). Journal of Cleaner Production.
  5. Bahuguna, P. C., Srivastava, R., & Tiwari, S. (2023). Two-decade journey of green human resource management research: A bibliometric analysis. Benchmarking, 30(2), 585–602.
  6. Dyllick, T. (2015). Responsible management education for a sustainable world. Journal of Management Development.
  7. Fauzi, A., Fitriasari, S., & Muthaqin, D. I. (2022). Development of student ecological intelligence through the implementation of ecopedagogy. In Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2021) (pp. 554–557). Atlantis Press.
  8. Goleman, D. (2010). Ecological intelligence: The coming age of radical transparency. Broadway Books.
  9. Hadler, M., et al. (2021). Surveying climate-relevant behavior: Measurements, obstacles, and implications.
  10. Han, H. (2021). Consumer behavior and environmental sustainability in tourism and hospitality: A review of theories, concepts, and latest research. In Sustainable Consumer Behaviour and the Environment (pp. 1–22).
  11. Hjorth Warlenius, R. (2022). Learning for life: ESD, ecopedagogy and the new spirit of capitalism. The Journal of Environmental Education, 53(3), 141–153.
  12. Juanda, et al. (2024). Ecoliteracy digital short stories among students in Indonesia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(2), 254–270.
  13. Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., & Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank Publications.
  14. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Republik Indonesia. (2022). Status lingkungan hidup Indonesia 2022. Jakarta: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.
  15. Koul, B., Yakoob, M., & Shah, M. P. (2022). Agricultural waste management strategies for environmental sustainability. Environmental Research, 206, 112285.
  16. Milfont, T. L., Osborne, D., Yogeeswaran, K., & Sibley, C. G. (2020). The role of national identity in collective pro-environmental action. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101522.
  17. Misiaszek, G. W. (2019). Ecopedagogy: Teaching critical literacies of ‘development’, ‘sustainability’, and ‘sustainable development’. Teaching in Higher Education.
  18. Mwaniki, R., & Gathenya, J. (2015). Role of human resource management functions on organizational performance with reference to Kenya Power & Lighting Company in Nairobi West Region. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(4), 432–448.
  19. Peters, M. A., & Araya, D. (2011). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. E-Learning and Digital Media.
  20. Pujianto, W. E., et al. (2021). Eco-pesantren: Islamic boarding school transformation program to support natural sustainability and sustainable development. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial & Mechanical Engineering and Operations Management, 873–885.
  21. Race, R., et al. (2022). Decolonising curriculum in education: Continuing proclamations and provocations. London Review of Education, 20(1).
  22. Rizaq, A. D. B. E., & Sarmini, S. (2021). Secondary school teachers and learners' perspectives on the future of education post COVID-19 pandemic. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 6(1), 171–182. http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/tadris/article/view/8385
  23. Rizaq, A. D. B. E., Sujatno, Thearith, S., & Sovanreach, S. (2024). The influence of an ecopedagogical approach in social studies learning on students’ ecological intelligence. International Journal of Geography, Social, and Multicultural Education, 2(1), 38–48. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/ijgsme/article/view/31527
  24. Saari, U. A., Damberg, S., Frömbling, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecological Economics, 189, 107155.
  25. Supriatna, N. (2016). Ecopedagogy: Membangun kecerdasan ekologis dalam pembelajaran IPS. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  26. Supriatna, N., Romadona, N. F., Saputri, A. E., & Darmayanti, M. (2018). Implementasi education for sustainable development (ESD) melalui ecopedagogy dalam pembelajaran tematik terpadu di sekolah dasar. Primaria Educationem Journal, 1(2), 80–86. http://journal.unla.ac.id/index.php/pej/article/view/1077
  27. Yunansah, H., & Herlambang, Y. T. (2017). Pendidikan berbasis ekopedagogik dalam menumbuhkan kesadaran ekologis dan mengembangkan karakter siswa sekolah dasar. EduHumaniora: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 9(1), 27–34. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/eduhumaniora/article/view/6153
  28. Zahrawati, F., Aras, A., Syahrul, Jumaisa, & Nzobonimpa, C. (2023). Designing a project-based ecoliteration learning trajectory to improve students’ ecological intelligence. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(2), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v8i2.3731
  29. Zocher, J. L., & Hougham, R. J. (2020). Implementing ecopedagogy as an experiential approach to decolonizing science education. Journal of Experiential Education, 43(3), 232–247.