A.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Authors should submit only manuscripts that have been carefully proofread. The manuscript is a scientific paper from research results or conceptual ideas. Written in Indonesia, English or Arabic. It is an original (35 % similarity using turnit in) and has never been published in other media. The author guidelines have undergone revisions, and the updated version is currently in use starting from Volume 23, Number 2 (2025). Authors are encouraged to use the provided template, which can be accessed through the following link see the journal template!

B.

WRITING RULES

1.

The manuscript is written a maximum of 20 pages using Book Antiqua, MS font size 11 with 1.0 spacing on A4 size. The Manuscript must consist of an Introduction, Literature Review Method, Results, and Discussion.  

2.

Systematics of scriptwriting research results include:

a.

Title

The title uses an effective sentence with a maximum of 17 words using Book Antiqua MS  font size 18 with 1.15. 

b.

Identity of Author

·     Author's Name

·     Affiliation

·     E-mail (correspondence)

c.

Abstract

The abstract is single-spaced typed in English between 250-350 words. Written with Book Antiqua (8 Pt).

Latar Belakang / Background

Bagian ini menjelaskan konteks umum atau persoalan utama yang menjadi landasan penelitian. This part outlines the general context or the core legal issue that underpins the research.

Tujuan / Purpose

Tujuan penelitian harus dijabarkan secara eksplisit. The research purpose should be clearly stated.

Metode / Methods

Metode menjelaskan pendekatan yang digunakan. This section describes the research approach.

Hasil / Results

Hasil penelitian menyebutkan temuan utama. The results summarize the main findings

Implikasi / Implication

Implikasi menyoroti pentingnya pengembangan pendekatan. This section highlights the need for courts to develop a more structured approach

Kebaruan / Originality

Kebaruan menjelaskan kontribusi unik penelitian ini. Originality describes the study’s unique contribution.

d.

Introduction 

Pendahuluan menjelaskan konteks umum penelitian, identifikasi masalah, dan celah penelitian (research gap). Penulis harus mengemukakan urgensi studi dan kontribusi ilmiahnya secara eksplisit. Bagian ini diakhiri dengan tujuan dan pertanyaan penelitian. Rujukan terhadap literatur mutakhir sangat penting untuk menunjukkan posisi penelitian dalam wacana ilmiah global.

The introduction presents the broader research context, identifies the problem, and highlights the research gap. Authors should clearly express the urgency and scholarly contribution of the study. This section should conclude with research objectives and questions. References to recent literature are essential to position the research within the global academic discourse (Aligned Left, Book Antiqua, 11 pt, 1.0).

e.

Literature Review

Bagian ini menguraikan teori-teori, konsep-konsep, dan temuan terdahulu yang relevan. Penulis perlu menunjukkan bagaimana penelitian ini memperluas, mengkritisi, atau menawarkan pendekatan baru terhadap literatur yang ada. Literature review juga dapat menjadi dasar perumusan kerangka konseptual penelitian.

This section outlines relevant theories, concepts, and previous findings. The author should demonstrate how the current study expands upon, critiques, or introduces new approaches to existing literature. The literature review may also form the foundation for the conceptual framework of the research (Aligned Left, Book Antiqua, 11 pt, 1.0).

1.  Theory 1 (Aligned Left, Book Antiqua, Bold, Italic, 12 pt, 1.0)

2.  Theory 2

f.

Research Methods

Metodologi menjelaskan pendekatan dan jenis penelitian, metode pengumpulan data, teknik analisis, serta validitas dan reliabilitas data. Untuk studi kualitatif, aspek etnografi, fenomenologi, atau studi kasus perlu dijelaskan secara rinci. Penjelasan metode harus transparan agar penelitian dapat direplikasi atau diverifikasi oleh peneliti lain.

The methodology section describes the research approach and type, data collection methods, analysis techniques, and the validity and reliability of data. For qualitative studies, elements such as ethnography, phenomenology, or case studies should be explained in detail. Method descriptions should be transparent to allow replication or verification by other researchers (Aligned Left, Book Antiqua, 11 pt, 1.0)
(For Conceptual Ideas Without Research Method)

g.

Results and Discussion

RESULTS (ALIGNED LEFT, BOOK ANTIQUA, BOLD, 12 PT, 1.0)

Bagian hasil menyajikan data atau temuan penelitian secara objektif tanpa interpretasi. Data dapat berupa kutipan wawancara (untuk penelitian kualitatif), hasil observasi, statistik (untuk penelitian kuantitatif), atau gabungan keduanya. Penyajian data harus sistematis, didukung tabel, gambar, atau grafik jika relevan. Setiap temuan yang disampaikan sebaiknya sesuai dengan tujuan dan rumusan masalah yang telah ditetapkan.

The results section presents the research findings objectively without interpretation. Data may include interview quotes (for qualitative research), observations, statistics (for quantitative research), or a combination of both. The presentation of results should be systematic, supported by tables, figures, or charts where appropriate. Each finding should align with the research objectives and questions. (Aligned Left, Book Antiqua, 11 pt, 1.0)

1.  Result 1 (Aligned Left, Book Antiqua, Bold, Italic, 12 pt, 1.0)

2.  Result 2

3.  Result 3

DISCUSSION (ALIGNED LEFT, BOOK ANTIQUA, BOLD, 12 PT, 1.0)

Bagian diskusi menafsirkan hasil yang telah disampaikan, dengan mengaitkannya pada teori, literatur, dan penelitian sebelumnya. Penulis harus menjelaskan makna temuan, keterkaitannya dengan isu yang lebih luas, serta kontribusi ilmiahnya. Diskusi juga dapat mencakup penjelasan terhadap hasil yang tidak sesuai ekspektasi, serta keterbatasan penelitian yang dihadapi. Penekanan pada kebaruan dan orisinalitas menjadi kunci penting dalam diskusi artikel jurnal bereputasi.

The discussion section interprets the findings presented earlier, relating them to existing theories, literature, and previous research. The author should explain the significance of the findings, their broader implications, and their scholarly contribution. The discussion may also address unexpected results and limitations of the study. Emphasizing novelty and originality is a key component in the discussion of reputable journal articles

1.  Discussion 1 (Aligned Left, Book Antiqua, Bold, Italic, 12 pt, 1.0)

2.  Discussion 2

3.  Discussion 3

Results should be clear and concise. Discussion should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. Avoid extensive citations and discussion of published literature (Aligned Left, Book Antiqua, 11 pt, 1.0)

h.

Conclusion

Kesimpulan memberikan jawaban langsung atas pertanyaan penelitian dan merangkum temuan utama. Disarankan untuk mencantumkan implikasi teoretis, praktis, atau kebijakan, serta saran untuk penelitian lanjutan.

The conclusion directly answers the research questions and summarizes the main findings. It is recommended to include theoretical, practical, or policy implications, as well as suggestions for future research

i.

Acknowledgment

[OPTIONAL]. This is used to appreciate the efforts of associates, who are not registered as co-authors, for their assistance and funding for your research/publication.

j.

References

Daftar pustaka pada artikel ini disusun dengan mengacu pada gaya penulisan APA edisi ke-7 dan dikelola menggunakan aplikasi manajemen referensi Mendeley. Seluruh referensi dipilih secara ketat berdasarkan relevansi ilmiah, keterbaruan, dan reputasi sumbernya. Sebanyak lebih dari 80% referensi merupakan artikel ilmiah yang diterbitkan dalam 10 tahun terakhir, dengan prioritas pada jurnal internasional bereputasi yang terindeks Scopus atau Web of Science. Pemilihan ini bertujuan untuk memastikan fondasi teoretis dan empirik yang kuat, terkini, dan kredibel dalam mendukung argumen dan temuan penelitian.

The reference list in this article is formatted according to the 7th edition of the APA style and managed using the Mendeley reference management application. All references were carefully selected based on their scientific relevance, recency, and source credibility. More than 80% of the references consist of scholarly journal articles published within the last ten years, with a focus on reputable international journals indexed in Scopus or Web of Science. This selection ensures that the theoretical and empirical foundations of the research are robust, up-to-date, and credible in supporting the study’s arguments and findings

Example:

A government is required to be effective and efficient, and reform-oriented (Gil-Garcia & Flores-Zúñiga, 2020). An effective reorganization is important for a proper administrative reform aiming to establish an effective and efficient government (Ministry of Menpan, 2014). However, Indonesia is yet to experience a change in its government structure mainly due to its complex legal framework. The legal complexity often impedes administrative reform in Indonesia. Reform in the public sector may be possible if the challenges posed by these complexities can be reduced and the laws are redesigned to reduce impediments to successful reform. This research examines critical factors and constraints for reorganizing government bodies in Indonesia, specifically statutory barriers in reorganization.  It is also argued that successful reform will depend on the capability to overcome legislation impediments. (Gu et al., 2020).

Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Flores-Zúñiga, M. Á. (2020). Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital government success: Integrating implementation and adoption factors. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101518

Ministry of Menpan. (2014). Policy Paper: Restructuring the Structures of Bureaucracy – Recommendation on the Structure of Central Government using the Concept of Machinery of Government. available at: https://menpan.go.id