Main Article Content

Abstract

This study seeks to determine the positive impact of PBA, which synchronizes student achievement in the learning process with final grades. Performance-Based Assessment (PBA) is a pedagogical strategy used to achieve student targets in the following learning objectives, especially in Academic Writing courses that aim to make students competent novice writers. The Performance-Based Assessment teaching style allows students to write seminar-ready draft proposals at the end of the Academic Writing course. It was decided to adopt a single case study research design to get more thorough data about the respondents. This study used Performance-Based Assessment (PBA) in academic writing classes. This study shows that Performance-Based Assessment improves student learning, notably in Academic Writing, proving that PBA is a good teaching method.

Keywords

Performance Based Assessment Writing Impact

Article Details

How to Cite
Dewi, A. C., Sheik Mohamed, Kh. Atikur Rahman, & Luís Miguel Oliveira de Barros Cardoso. (2024). The Impact of Performance-Based Assessment on Academic Writing Instruction. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 7(1), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v7i1.9030

References

  1. Abualrob, M., & Al-Saadi, S. H. 2019. Performance-Based Assessment: Approach and Obstacles by Higher-Elementary Science Teachers in Palestine. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(2), 198-206.
  2. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 3.
  3. Aries, N., Mujahidah, & Nanning. (2021). The Teaching Vocabulary Through Students’ Visual Spatial Intelligence. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 3(2), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v3i2.1453
  4. Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. J. (1990). Looking at the bright side: A positive approach to qualitative policy and evaluation research. Qualitative sociology, 13(2), 183-92.
  5. Bracey, G. W. 1993. Assessing the New Assessments. Principal, 72(3), 34-36.
  6. Brown, J. R. (2021). Who rules in science?. In Who Rules in Science?. Harvard University Press.
  7. Cizek, G. J. 1991. Innovation or enervation? Performance assessment in perspective. The Phi Delta Kappan, 72(9), 695-699.
  8. Connell, J. P. 1990. Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life span. Ehlers, A., & Clark, D. M. (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behaviour research and therapy, 38(4), 319-345.
  9. Dalton, B., Morocco, C. C., Tivnan, T., & Rawson Mead, P. L. 1997. Supported inquiry science: Teaching for conceptual change in urban and suburban science classrooms. Journal of learning disabilities, 30(6), 670-684.
  10. Epstein, A. (2006). Assessment the Portfolio Process. Tersedia pada http://www. teachervision. fen. com/teaching-methods/exp-educ/4537. html. Diakses pada tanggal, 31.
  11. Farizka, N. M., Santihastuti, A., & Suharjito, B. (2020). Students’ learning engagement in writing class: A task-based learning. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 5(2), 203-212.
  12. Finn, J. D. 1993. School Engagement & Students at Risk.
  13. Hawkey, C., et al. 2012 "Endoscopic evaluation of the gastro‐duodenal tolerance of short‐term analgesic treatment with 25 mg diclofenac‐K liquid capsules." Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 35.7: 819-827.
  14. Hibbard, K. M. 1999. Performance Assessment in the Classroom. New York: Mc. Graw Hill.
  15. Howell, K. W., Bigelow, S. S., Moore, E. L., & Evoy, A. M. (1993). Bias in authentic assessment. Diagnostique, 19(1), 387-400.
  16. Jackson, J. M., & Latane, B. 1981. Strength and number of solicitors and the urge toward altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(3), 415-422.
  17. Jørgensen, E. H., Christiansen, J. S., & Jobling, M. 1993. Effects of stocking density on food intake, growth performance and oxygen consumption in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus). Aquaculture, 110(2), 191-204.
  18. Kijjoa, A., & Sawangwong, P. (2004). Drugs and cosmetics from the sea. Marine Drugs, 2(2), 73-82.
  19. Kiriakos, C. M., & Tienari, J. 2018. Academic writing as love. Management Learning, 49(3), 263-277.
  20. Kuh, G. D. 2009. The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New directions for institutional research, 141, 5-20.
  21. Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. 2000. Measurement and Assessment in Teaching.Seventh Edition. Englewood Cliff: Merril, an imprint of Prentice Hall.
  22. Madaus, G. F., & O'Dwyer, L. M. 1999. A short history of performance assessment: Lessons learned. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(9), 688.
  23. Marzano, R. S., Pickering, D., & McTighe, S. 1993. Assessing student outcomes: Performance assessment using the dimensions of learning model.
  24. Meza, A., Rodríguez, I., & Caviedes, L. 2021. Fostering EFL Preservice Teachers’ Academic Writing Skills Through Reflective Learning. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 23(1), 89-106.
  25. Morris, K. V., Chan, S. W. L., Jacobsen, S. E., & Looney, D. J. (2004). Small interfering RNA-induced transcriptional gene silencing in human cells. Science, 305(5688), 1289-1292.
  26. Murray, R., & Moore, S. 2006. The handbook of academic writing: A fresh approach. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
  27. O'Sullivan, D. 2012 "Always Speaking: the Treaty of Waitangi and public policy, Veronica Tawhai and Katarina Gray-Sharp (eds).": 100-101.
  28. Oxborough, K., & Baker, N. R. (1997). An instrument capable of imaging chlorophyll a fluorescence from intact leaves at very low irradiance and at cellular and subcellular levels of organization. Plant, Cell & Environment, 20(12), 1473-1483.
  29. Paris, N., Samad, P., & Namchan, M. (2023). A Corpus-Based Study of Grammatical Collocation on Asian EFL Learners. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 6(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v6i2.6252
  30. Parsons, J., & Taylor, L. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current issues in education, 14(1).
  31. Patricia, C. S., Nerea, G. V., Erik, U., Elena, S. M., Eider, B., & Manu, S. (2017). Responses to silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate in a battery of biomarkers measured in coelomocytes and in target tissues of Eisenia fetida earthworms. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 141, 57-63.
  32. Shehadeh, M., Suaifan, G., Darwish, R. M., Wazaify, M., Zaru, L., & Alja’fari, S. (2012). Knowledge, attitudes and behavior regarding antibiotics use and misuse among adults in the community of Jordan. A pilot study. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 20(2), 125-133.
  33. Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Pine, J. 1992. Research news and comment: Performance assessments: Political rhetoric and measurement reality. Educational Researcher, 21(4), 22-27.
  34. Singh, M. K. M. 2019. International graduate students’ academic writing practices in Malaysia: Challenges and solutions. Journal of International Students, 5(1), 12-22.
  35. Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. 1990. What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 22.
  36. Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., & Groff, C. (2009). Effective programs in middle and high school mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 839-911.
  37. Spohr, H. L., Willms, J., & Steinhausen, H. C. (2007). Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in young adulthood. The Journal of pediatrics, 150(2), 175-179.
  38. Stern, G. G., Stein, M. I., & Bloom, B. S. (1956). Methods in personality assessment.
  39. Stiggings, R. (2001). Student-involved classroom assessment. (3rd ed.). Upper Sadle River, NJ: Merril-Prentice Hall.
  40. Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The higher education academy, 11(1), 1-15. ttp://www.unrc.edu.ar/unrc/ academica/pdf/cuadernillo01.pdf
  41. Washer, G. (2012). Advances in the use of thermographic imaging for the condition assessment of bridges. Bridge Structures, 8(2), 81-90.
  42. Web 2.0 Tools and Language Competencies. MEXTESOL Journal, Volume 36, Number 1: 1-12
  43. Williams, P. J., Strauss, C. R., & Wilson, B. (1980). Hydroxylated linalool derivatives as precursors of volatile monoterpenes of Muscat grapes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 28(4), 766-771.
  44. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.