Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to identity the validity, realibility and difficulty level of summative test made by EFL teacher at eight grade of SMPN 2 Watang Pulu Sidenreng Rappang. The results of this study were beneficial for the teacher and students because they gained proper information about quality of summative test created by EFL Teacher. The samples of this study were 20 students and 1 data of summative test conducted from the teacher. The researcher conducted the research by quantitative method. The data collection technique was taken document of summative English test. The data was analyzed by using validity, reliability and difficulty level analysis. The result of validity was have 0,344 with significance level of 5%. Items of English summative test n as valid 14 items with percentage (70%), invalid items are 6 items with percentage (30%). The reliability is category reliabel showed index 0,82higher than 0,70. Level of difficulty, the total items as easy category there are 2 items (10%), the total of medium category are 12 items test with percentage (60%), and difficult category have 6 items with percentage (30%). From the result above, the level of difficulty of English summative test items have a good category because the medium category more than 50%.


 


 

Keywords

Summative Test QualityEFL TeacherEvaluation

Article Details

Author Biographies

Kalsum Kalsum, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare

 

 

 

Ahmed Sardi, STKIP Darud Da'wah Wal Irsyad Pinrang

 

 

How to Cite
Kalsum, K., Sardi, A., & Andini, N. (2023). THE QUALITY OF SUMMATIVE TEST MADE BY EFL TEACHER. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 6(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v6i1.4327

References

  1. Ahmad, A. K., Ishak, & Afdalia. (2022). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Matematika melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray. Al-Irsyad Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.58917/ijme.v1i2.23
  2. Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara (PT Bumi Aksara).
  3. Ermawati, E., Nurchalis, N. F., & Sardi, A. (2021). Online EFL Teaching and Learning: Different skills, Different Challenges. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning. Linguistics and Literature, 9(1), 373-382.
  4. Gay, R. . (2006). Educational Research; Competencies for Analysis & Application (Eight Edit). Barkley Lehigh Press.
  5. Humaeroah, H., Sardi, A., & Ermawati, E. (2023). Teacher Perspective: Managing Students’ Behavior Problem in Teaching English at Primary School. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(2), 2113-2121.
  6. Kalsum, K., Rauf, F. A., & Sardi, A. (2023). Implementation of Reading-Log to Increase Students’ Interest on Literacy at Islamic Boarding School. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(2), 1887-1898.
  7. Khasanah, N. (2016). The Analysis of Students’ Perceptions for The Impact of Formative and Summative Test for The fourth Semester Students of English Education Department in IAIN Salatiga in The Academic Year of 2015/2016 [IAIN Salatiga]. http://e-repository.perpus.iainsalatiga.ac.id/1420/
  8. Mahshanian, A., Shoghi, R., & Bahrami, M. (2019). Investigating the differential effects of formative and summative assessment on efl learners’ end-of-term achievement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(5), 1055–1066. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1005.19
  9. Nurchalis, N. F., Ermawati, E., Sardi, A., & Nursabra, N. (2021). Language Laboratory to Overcome the Barrier of Classroom English Learning: Does it Exist and Is it Used in Islamic Schools of Majene?. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 3(3), 183-194.
  10. Salwa, A. (2012). The validity, Realibility, Level of Difficulty, and Appropriateness of Curriculum of the English TEST [Diponegoro University]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/19755101.pdf
  11. Sanjata, A. R. M. P., Sardi, A., & Muchtar, J. (2022). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Melalui Model Pembelajaran Tutor Sebaya Setting Kooperatif. Al-Irsyad: Journal of Education Science, 1(2), 117-124.
  12. Sardi, A. (2022). The Building up of Students’ Vocabulary Mastery through Knowing by Heart Strategy. LETS: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching Studies, 4(1), 62-72.
  13. Sardi, A., Haryanto, A., & Weda, S. (2017). The Distinct types of diction used by the efl teachers in the classroom interaction. International Journal Of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(3), 1061-1066.
  14. Sardi, A., JN, M. F., Walid, A., & Ahmad, A. K. (2022). An Analysis Of Difficulties In Online English Learning Experienced By The Efl Teacher. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 5(2), 144-154.
  15. Sardi, A., & Mujahidah, M. (2020). Could I Be Illogical?(Cibi Guide) For Non-Native Speaker.
  16. Sardi, A., Surahmat, Z., & Nur, S. (2022). The Washback of Intensive TOEFL Training Program (ITTP) on Student’s Learning Motivation. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(4), 593-597.
  17. Surahmat, Z., Sardi, A., & JN, M. F. (2023). A CHAPTER REVIEW: SELECTING LANGUAGE FOR MATERIALS WRITING: (The Routledge Handbook of Materials Development for Language Teaching-Routledge). Al-Irsyad: Journal of Education Science, 2(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.58917/aijes.v2i1.39
  18. Tuckman, B. W. (1975). Measuring Educational Outcomes Fundamentals of Testing. Harcourt Brace Javanovich Inc.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.