Main Article Content

Abstract

Teaching scientific writing has been compulsory in many Indonesian universities. It is usually the main indicator for completing an undergraduate program. Despite this fact, not only do universities apply similar policies, but training in that particular skill is also an increasingly common trend. The Open University of Indonesia, widely known as Universitas Terbuka, is the biggest and the only university that administers distance learning in the state, to implement this policy. An example is the existence of a scientific writing course, a compulsory course in the English Education Department of the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, where the course is taught to all students as a requirement to graduate from the university. This research was established by selecting seven participants who were enrolled in the course. The objective is to assess the appearance of critical thinking and literacy among students who have been trained in the subject. Seven academic papers representing these seven students were analyzed to identify traces of both necessary skills for conducting research: critical thinking and literacy. The qualitative method was chosen to determine whether students write using critical thinking and literacy. After analyzing the data, the researcher concluded positive findings on the use of both skills, although not all students performed well. However, one particular student showed a unique pattern in applying these skills. In terms of critical thinking, the researcher identified three sequences, while pairing techniques were employed in critical literacy to accommodate this skill's presence.

Keywords

Critical LiteracyCritical ThinkingDistance LearningScientific Writing

Article Details

How to Cite
Hadianti, S. (2025). Critical Thinking and Literacy Skills in Student Scientific Writing: Evidence from Universitas Terbuka. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 8(2), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v8i2.14876

References

  1. Albert, M. (2022). Defining Critical Literacy: A Challenge to a Power Structure. Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education, 21 (1). Retrieved from https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/taboo/vol21/iss1/2
  2. Appatova, V., & Horning, A. (2023). Developing critical literacy: An urgent goal. To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development, 42(2), 4.): https://doi.org/10.3998/tia.2032
  3. Ar, Y. M. (2020). The Effect of Animation Movies towards Writing Skill in Online Class. Journal of English Language and Education, 5(2), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v5i2.75
  4. Atkinson, D. (2012). A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587975
  5. Auerbach. E. (1999). The Power of Writing, the Writing of Power Approaches to adult ESOL writing instruction. Focus on Basics, 3(D)
  6. Boyle, J., Ramsay, S., & Struan, A. (2019). The Academic Writing Skills Programme: A model for technology-enhanced, blended delivery of an academic writing programme. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.16.4.4
  7. Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2023) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications Ltd.
  8. Davies, M., & Barnett, R. (2015). The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. Fatimah, F., & Yusuf, F. N. (2018). Assessment for learning impacts on students’ responsive writing skills. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 231, 42–45. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/amic-18.2018.11
  10. Gustine, G. G. (2018). A survey on critical literacy as a pedagogical approach to teaching English in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 531-537. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9798
  11. Hitchcock, C. (2018). Probabilistic Causation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-probabilistic
  12. JDIH. (2010). Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/163898/permendikbud-no-17-tahun-2010
  13. Llyosovna, A. N. (2020). The importance of English language. International Journal on Orange Technologies, 2(1). https://journals.researchparks.org/index.php/IJOT/article/view/478
  14. O’Reilly, C., Devitt, A., & Hayes, N. (2024). The storythinking programme: a framework for nurturing critical thinking in preschool. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 33(4), 576–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2024.2410321
  15. Patria, R. (2022). Critical Literacy and its Challenges in Education in Indonesia. Journal of Literature Language and Academic Studies, 1(01). https://doi.org/10.56855/jllans.v1i01.141
  16. Pennycook, A. (2017). Critical applied linguistics and education. In Language Policy and Political Issues in Education (pp. 173–184). Springer.
  17. Romadhon, S. A., Indrayanti, I., & Qurohman, M. T. (2022). Animation movies for enhancing vocabulary: A quantitative study among vocational school students. Journal of English Language Learning, 6(1). 121-126. https://doi.org/10.31949/jell.v6i1.2833
  18. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Cetakan ke-24. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  19. Tahira, M., & Haider, G. (2019). The Role of Critical Thinking in Academic Writing: An Investigation of EFL Students’ Perceptions. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 8(1), 1–17.
  20. Tovar, VVR., Medina, JEL., and Bajaña, PML. (2024). Challenges in developing productive skills in English: learners’ insights. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias. 3:659. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024.659.
  21. Walsh, C., Quinn, N. G., Wieman, C., & Holmes, N. G. (2019). Quantifying critical thinking: Development and validation of the Physics Lab Inventory of Critical thinking (PLIC). Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 10135, 0.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010135