Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 4 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research analyzes the function and use of language in Linguistic Landscape signs at three train stations in Jakarta, namely Gambir station, Manggarai station, and Dukuh Atas BNI MRT station. This research examines how Linguistic Landscape signs affect passenger accessibility and comfort. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method, and data is collected through field observations, photo documentation and passenger interviews. Then, the data analysis technique uses the Miles and Huberman (2019) technique, data reduction, data display, and verification. The results of this research show that most of the signs at the three stations are bilingual signs in Indonesian-English, followed by monolingual signs in English and Indonesian. The Linguistic Landscape signs at this station have proven effective in providing information that is easy to understand and easily accessible to local and foreign passengers. These signs also increase accessibility and comfort for passengers at the station. This research contributes to understanding the function and use of language in the Linguistic Landscape of public spaces, especially at train stations.

Keywords

Linguistic LandscapeSignJakarta Train StationLanguage FunctionLanguage Use

Article Details

How to Cite
Andreana, C., & Rofiq, Z. . (2024). Function and Use of Language in Linguistic Landscape Signs at Jakarta Train Station. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 7(2), 274–299. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v7i2.10732
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Artawa, K., Mulyanah, A., Atmawati, D., Paramarta, I. M. S., Satyawati, M. S., & Purnawati, K. W. (2023). Language Choice and Multilingualism on Restaurant Signs: A Linguistic Landscape Analysis. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 11(3), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2023.2007382.3106
  2. da Silva, A. M., Tjung, Y. N., Wijayanti, S. H., & Suwartono, C. (2021). Language use and tourism in Yogyakarta: The linguistic landscape of Malioboro. Wacana, 22(2), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.17510/WACANA.V22I2.721
  3. Darmawan, R. (2017). A Study of Linguistics Landscape Towards Tourism Enterpreneur Language Ability at Simanindo District, Samosir Regency, North Sumatera Province. Journal Polingua: Scientific Journal of Linguistic Literatura and Education, 6(2), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.30630/polingua.v6i2.114
  4. Datang, F. A., Munawarah, S., Triwinarti, W., & Lauder, M. R. (2022). Signage in Public Spaces: Impact of Tourism on the Linguistic Landscape of Labuan Bajo. International Review of Humanities Studies, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/irhs.v7i1.394
  5. Diana, P. N., Wildaniyah, T., Oktavia, T. A. T., & Ekawati, R. (2022). Landscape Linguistic of Sumenep Tourism Destination in the New Normal Era. Prosodi, 16(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.21107/prosodi.v16i1.13379
  6. Ilhamsyah, F., Ginting, R., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Analisis Kepuasan Pengguna Jasa Transportasi Umum Jak Lingko Di Jakarta Selatan. Business Management, Economic, and Accounting National Seminar, 1(1), 1059–1076.
  7. İnal, D., Bayyurt, Y., Özturhan, M., & Bektaş, S. (2021). Multilingualism in the linguistic landscape of Istanbul. World Englishes, 40(2), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12514
  8. Khoiriyah, N. N., & Savitri, A. D. (2021). Lanskap linguistik stasiun jatinegara jakarta timur. Bapala, 8(6), 177–193.
  9. Lu, X., Sudipa, I. N., Artawa, K., & Suastra, I. M. (2021). On linguistic landscape in language service at da li ancient city, China. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(6), 1000–1009. https://doi.org/10.17507/JLTR.1206.16
  10. Mauliddian, K., Nurhayani, I., & Hamamah, H. (2022). Penanda Publik Bahasa Kawi di Kota Probolinggo: Kajian Lanskap Linguistik. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 11(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v11i1.2716
  11. Mubarak, W., & Abdul Muthalib, K. (2021). A linguistic landscape analysis of shop signs. English Education Journal, 12(3), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v12i3.18146
  12. Nirwana, Nurhamdah, & Mujahidah. (2020). Integrative Motivation of Students in Learning English: Case Study on Rumah Bambu Pintar in Pinrang. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 3(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v3i2.2049
  13. Prawata, A. (2014). Fasilitas Transit Transportasi Umum sebagai Media untuk Menciptakan Mobilitas dan Bagian Kota Jakarta yang Sehat. ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, 5(2), 879. https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v5i2.2293
  14. Purnawati, K. W., Artawa, K., & Satyawati, M. S. (2022). Linguistic Landscape of Jalan Gajah Mada Heritage Area in Denpasar City. Jurnal Arbitrer, 9(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.9.1.27-38.2022
  15. Putra, A. S. (2020). Penerapan Konsep Kota Pintar dengan Cara Penerapan ERP (Electronic Road Price) di Jalan Ibu Kota DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang, 5(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.32493/informatika.v5i1.4433
  16. Putri, I., Nurjaleka, L., & Afifah, M. (2024). Virtual Linguistic Landscape During Post-Covid 19 in Haneda Airport Public Space. Journal of Language and Literature, 24(1), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v24i1.6736
  17. Rastitiati, N. K. J. (2023). The Linguistic Landscape at I Gusti Ngurah Rai International Airport, Bali: Users’ Attitudes. LACULTOUR: Journal of Language and Cultural Tourism, 2(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.52352/lacultour.v2i1.1104
  18. Ratnaningtyas, H., Asmaniati, F., & Desafitri Ratu Bilqis, L. (2022). Berwisata ke Kota Jakarta dengan Kemacetannya. Jmpp, 4(2), 58–66. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JMPP/article/view/43701/pdf
  19. Rizki Pratama, M., & Kartika, D. (2023). Lanskap Linguistik pada Daftar Menu Restoran Ala Jepang di Kota Padang. https://ejurnal.bunghatta.ac.id/index.php/JFIB/article/view/23650
  20. Sardi, A., Firmansyah JN, M., Walid, A., & Ahmad, A. K. (2022). an Analysis of Difficulties in Online English Learning Experienced By the Efl Teacher. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 5(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v5i2.2806
  21. Sari, R. N. (2021). Penamaan Toko Di Sidoarjo Kota: Kajian Lanskap Linguistik. Bapala, 8(3), 47–62.
  22. Septiawan, F. D. (2022). Perkembangan Sejarah Kota Jakarta Pasca Kemerdekaan Indonesia. HEURISTIK: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 2(2), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.31258/hjps.2.2.104-109
  23. Spolsky, B. (2020). Linguistic Landscape. The Semiotics of Public Signage. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.00015.spo
  24. Teo Yong, B. (2022). The Language of Tourism : Linguistic Landscape of Tourist Attractions in Singapore. 33–34(XVII), 65–114.
  25. Vesya, N. F., & Datang, F. A. (2022). Lanskap Linguistik Stasiun Mrt Lebak Bulus Grab. Prosiding Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya (KOLITA), 20(20), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.25170/kolita.20.3800
  26. Wafa, A., & Wijayanti, S. (2018). Signs of Multilingualism at Religious Places in Surabaya: A Linguistic Landscape Study. 228(Klua), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.2991/klua-18.2018.5
  27. Widiyanto, G. (2019). Lanskap Linguistik di Museum Radya Pustaka Surakarta. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Linguistik Dan Sastra, Kajian Linguistik pada Karya Sastra, 255–262. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosidingsemantiks