Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 21 Download : 10

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study explored the experiences of students with technology-integrated English language instruction at two Indonesian universities, Universitas Borneo Tarakan (UBT) and Universitas Sawerigading Makassar (UNSA). The primary aim was to understand the influence of perceived autonomy, competence, relatedness, and motivation levels on English language learning outcomes. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach that combined survey data and thematic analysis of interviews, we found that students generally reported high levels of these factors. Minor differences were observed between UBT and UNSA in terms of perceived autonomy and competence-relatedness. Positive correlations were identified between these factors and improved performance in English language learning; for example, autonomy positively correlated with English learning outcomes (r = 0.60*), as did competence (r = 0.65*), relatedness (r = 0.62*), and motivation levels (r = 0.70*). These findings highlight the importance of fostering learners' sense of autonomy, competence building, and relatedness in technology-enhanced instruction settings to promote intrinsic motivation according to Self-Determination Theory (SDT). Further research is recommended to explore other potential influencing factors such as individual attitudes towards technology or external factors like teaching quality or course design.

Keywords

English Language LearningSelf-DeterminationDigital ClassroomAutonomyCompetenceRelatedness

Article Details

How to Cite
De Vega, N., & Rahayu. (2023). Enhancing English Learning: Self-Determination in Indonesia Digital Classrooms. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 6(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v6i2.6611
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ali, S. M. (2021). “Fun Learning Environment Pascagempa 6,2 M” di Panti Asuhan Manakara Muhammadiyah Mamuju. MASPUL JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT, 3(1), 61–65.
  2. Alrabai, F. (2021). The Influence of Autonomy-Supportive Teaching on EFL Students’ Classroom Autonomy: An Experimental Intervention. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.728657
  3. Bawa, P. (2016). Retention in Online Courses. SAGE Open, 6(1), 215824401562177. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621777
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.
  5. Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fourth Edi). Sage Publications.
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. In Designing and conducting mixed methods research approach (Third Edit). Sage Publications, Inc.
  7. Dahlan, E., Sunubi, Abd. H., & Ahdar, A. (2019). The Students’ Learning Strategy and Motivation in Developing Their Speaking Ability at Sixth Semester of English Department (IAIN Parepare). Inspiring: English Education Journal, 2(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v2i2.1272
  8. Deci & Ryan. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  9. Farsawang, P., & Songkram, N. (2023). Fostering technology integration and adaptability in higher education: Insights from the COVID-19 pandemic. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep456.
  10. Fitriani, F., Nur, R., Bustamin, B., … S. A.-I. J. for, & 2019, undefined. (2019). Improving Students’ Descriptive Text Writing by Using Writing in the Here and Now Strategy at the Tenth Grade Students of Vocational High School. Ojs.Unimal.Ac.Id, 1(6), 632–636. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i6.1802
  11. Han, K. (2021). Fostering Students’ Autonomy and Engagement in EFL Classroom Through Proximal Classroom Factors: Autonomy-Supportive Behaviors and Student-Teacher Relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767079
  12. Hasanah, N. (2022). TOEFL For Santri: Peningkatan Softskill Bahasa Asing Menuju Era Society 5.0. MASPUL JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT, 4(2), 380–385. https://ummaspul.e-journal.id/pengabdian/article/view/4625
  13. Hockly, N., & Dudeney, G. (2018). Current and Future Digital Trends in ELT. RELC Journal, 49(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218777318
  14. Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers & Education, 95, 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.014
  15. Kahu, E. R., Thomas, H. G., & Heinrich, E. (2022). ‘A sense of community and camaraderie’: Increasing student engagement by supplementing an LMS with a Learning Commons Communication Tool. Active Learning in Higher Education, 146978742211276. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221127691
  16. Li, Q., Jiang, Q., Liang, J.-C., Pan, X., & Zhao, W. (2022). The influence of teaching motivations on student engagement in an online learning environment in China. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7280
  17. Lin, M.-H., Chen, H.-C., & Liu, K.-S. (2017). A Study of the Effects of Digital Learning on Learning Motivation and Learning Outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553–3564. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a
  18. Luthfiyyah, R., Aisyah, A., & Sulistyo, G. H. (2021). Technology-enhanced formative assessment in higher education: A voice from Indonesian EFL teachers. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 6(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.6.1.42-54
  19. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
  20. Mas’ud, B., Fachruddin, A. T. C., & Syamsinar, S. (2019). Promoting Passion-Based Learning as a Solution of Improving Creativity in English Classroom. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 2(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v2i2.1273
  21. Miles, B. M., Huberman, M. A., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Third Edit). Sage.
  22. Noviasmy, Y., Hasanah, N., & Dalle, A. (2023). APPLYING QUIZIZZ APPLICATION AS AN ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR EFL STUDENTS. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 6(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.35905/INSPIRING.V6I1.4835
  23. Park, M., & Son, J.-B. (2022). Pre-service EFL teachers’ readiness in computer-assisted language learning and teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1815649
  24. Prasad, P. W. C., Maag, A., Redestowicz, M., & Hoe, L. S. (2018). Unfamiliar technology: Reaction of international students to blended learning. Computers & Education, 122, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.016
  25. Rahayu, R., Nur, S., Mardiani, M., & Nur, M. S. (2022). Self-determination theory in teaching practice for higher education level. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka) : Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 7(1), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v7i1.7978
  26. Rahman, A., Ali, S. M., & Badriah. (2022). Integrating Local Culture-Based Instruction in Teaching Speaking Classroom at the Third Semester Students of Universitas Tomakaka Mamuju. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 5(1), 64–72.
  27. Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2021). Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1862657
  28. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness (R. M. Ryan & E. L. Deci, Eds.). Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
  29. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
  30. Sari, N. N. M. (2022). An Analysis of Classroom Interaction on EFL Students. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 5(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v5i2.2718
  31. Van Blankenstein, F. M., Saab, N., van der Rijst, R. M., Danel, M. S., Bakker-van den Berg, A. S., & van den Broek, P. W. (2019). How do self-efficacy beliefs for academic writing and collaboration and intrinsic motivation for academic writing and research develop during an undergraduate research project? Educational Studies, 45(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1446326
  32. Vega, N. De, & Nur, S. (2022). Enhancing Students’english Achievement Through Interactive Digital. National Seminar of PBI (English Language Education), 197–205.
  33. Vega, N. D., Basri, M., & Nur, S. (2023). From Smartphones to Smart Classrooms: The Impact of Mobile Technology in Education (R. Rahayu & I. Anas, Eds.). Dewa Publishing.
  34. Wang, S.-K., Hsu, H.-Y., Reeves, T. C., & Coster, D. C. (2014). Professional development to enhance teachers’ practices in using information and communication technologies (ICTs) as cognitive tools: Lessons learned from a design-based research study. Computers & Education, 79, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.006
  35. Wehmeyer, M. L., Shogren, K. A., Toste, J. R., & Mahal, S. (2017). Self-Determined Learning to Motivate Struggling Learners in Reading and Writing. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(5), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216676800
  36. Wulandari, W., Juddah, A. B., & Sunubi, A. H. (2018). Psychological Barriers and Their Influence Towards Students’ Speaking Ability. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 1(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v1i1.833