Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aim to find out the difference in reading skill between students who are taught of using L-R-D strategy and without using L-R-D strategy at the first grade of SMPN 10 Parepare. Furthermore, its aim is to determine the effectiveness of the Listen-Read-discuss strategy in reading skill learning at the first grade of Junior High School 10 Parepare. This research is an experiment design using pretest posttest design. The population of this research was all classes VII of SMP Negeri 10 Parepare, with samples of class VII 4 was experiment class and class VII 3 was control class. Data was obtained by Barret’s taxonomy reading skill test. The validity used is the validity of items that are assisted by computer item program. Reliability using the alpha Cronbach formula obtained result of 0.93. the data analysis technique used T-test with a significance of 5%. Before the data analysis was carried out using t-test technique, the prerequisite analysis test was carried out in the form of data distribution normality test and variant homogeneity test. The results of the pretest and posttest calculation of both groups are normal and homogeneous. T-test analysis of pretest data in reading skill of the experimental group and the control group, obtained -0.930 and (sig 0.357>0.05). This result indicates the initial skill of the experimental group and the control group were the same or there were no significant differences between the two group. T-test result of posttest in reading skill of the experimental group and the control group obtained -3.505 and (sig 0.000< 0.05) based on these data the results of this research showed significant differences between groups taught using of Listen-read-discuss strategy and without Listen-read-discuss strategy. The result of analysis T-test of the pretest and posttest showed that Listen-read-discuss strategy was effective to improve reading skill at the first grade of SMPN 10 Parepare.

Keywords

Reading Skill Listen-Read-Discuss Strategy

Article Details

How to Cite
Eralisa, & Mujahidah. (2019). The Application of Listen-Read-Discuss (L-R-D) Strategy to Improve Reading Skill at the First Grade of SMPN 10 Parepare. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v2i1.1172

References

  1. Albert J. Haris and Edward R. Sipay. 1940. How to Increase Reading Ability, Seventh Edition Revised and Enlarged. Longman, New York and London.
  2. Albert J. Haris and Edward R. Sipay. 1975. How to Increase Reading Ability, Seventh Edition Revised and Enlarged. Longman, New York and London.
  3. Ali,Abdullah Yusuf.The Holy Qur’an Arabic Text With English Translation. Thomas Road London.
  4. Anggraeni,Mita Bugi. 2014.The reading comprehension of the eighth-grade students of SMPN Negeri 1 Puncakwangi Pati in the academic year 2013/ 2014 taught by using LRD (listen read discuss).
  5. Akurinto. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  6. Brown, H.Douglas. 2004. Language Assessment. Principles and Classroom Practices. San Fransisco State University: Pearson Eduacation.
  7. Charles. 2003. Communicative and Cognitive Procedure in Reading. Prague: Education.
  8. Christine, Nuttal. 2005. Teaching Reading Skill in a foreign Language Oxford: Macmillan Education.
  9. Cosper, Russel. November 1953. ”Improving Reading Skill,” Jurnal of Communication 3, No. 2.
  10. David, Nunan. 1999. Second Langauge Teaching and Learning. New York: Heinly Publisher.
  11. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Pusat. 2012. Pedoman Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Disdik.
  12. DonalAry.2002. Introduction to Research in Education, (8th edition). Canada: Wardsworth,CengegeLearning.
  13. Fatel, M. F. and Praveen M. Jain. 2008. English Language Teaching Methods, Tools and Technique. Sunrice: Jaipur.
  14. Grab and Stoller. 2002. “Purpose of Reading”. Learning English.
  15. Hamidah. 2012. Improving the Student’s Reading Skill through Sight Word at the Eight Year Students of SMPN 3 MAJENE. Skripsi STAIN Parepare.
  16. Harmer, Jeremy. 1998. How to Teach English. London: Person Education Limited.
  17. Kenna, Mc. , Mickael C, and Robinson, Richard. 2002. Teaching Through Text: A Context Literacy Approach to Content Area Reading(3rded). New York: Stenhouse Publisher.
  18. Kenneth. 1973. Theoretical Models and Process of Reading. New York.: International Reading Association.
  19. Lems, Kristin. 2010. Teaching Reading To English Language Learners. New York : London.
  20. Manzo, Anthony V. & Casale Ula P. 1985. Listen-Read-Discuss: A Content Reading Heuristic. Journal of Reading.
  21. OECD. 1999. Meaning Student Knowledge and Skill. Paris: OECD, A Framework for Assesment.
  22. Mujahidah, M., Nurhamdah, N., Nanning, N., Amzah, A., Sunubi, A. H., & Magdahalena, M. & Humairah, H.(2020). Find Yourself on Vocabulary Size: A Guide for Students.
  23. Nurchalis, N. F., Ermawati, E., Sardi, A., & Nursabra, N. (2021). Language Laboratory to Overcome the Barrier of Classroom English Learning: Does it Exist and Is it Used in Islamic Schools of Majene?. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 3(3), 183-194.
  24. Pamela. 2004. New Realities of secondary Teachers Work. Oxford: Symposium Books.
  25. Paris and Hamilton. 2009. Identifying Three Dimensions to Students Reading UK: Education.
  26. Pariska, Dian. 2015. The Effect of Using Listen-Read-Discuss (L-R-D) Strategyand Students Prior Knowledge On The Students Reading Comprehension Of The Second Years Students At MA DaarunNahdhah Thawalib Bangkinang. Thesis UIN Suska Riau.
  27. Rismayani. 2015. Improving the Reading Comprehension of the Eight Year Students of SMP Negeri 6 Parepare Through Listen-Read-Discuss (LRD) Strategy. Skripsi Universitas Muhammadiyah (UMPAR) Parepare.
  28. Sardi, A. (2017). The Discourse Analysis on Teachers’ Diction Used in TEFL at SMPN 2 Lembang, Pinrang (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Makassar).
  29. Sardi, A., Haryanto, A., & Weda, S. (2017). The Distinct types of diction used by the efl teachers in the classroom interaction. International Journal Of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(3), 1061-1066.
  30. Sugiyono. 2010. Methode penelitian pendidikan. Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta.
  31. University of Melboume. 2010. Teaching and Learning Unit. Sidney.
  32. Webster. 2003. Comprehensive Dictionary of the English Language. Trident Press International.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.